Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWD vs PJBF
FWD vs PJBF Comparison
Open Charts FWD vs PJBF
AB Disruptors ETF
Price$91.44
Change+$0.04 (+0.04%)
Volume$100
Net Assets841.56M
PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF
Price$61.44
Change+$0.30 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.87M
FWD vs PJBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWD vs. PJBF commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWD is a Buy and PJBF is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 842M vs. PJBF (15.9M). FWD has a higher annual dividend yield than PJBF: FWD (15.419) vs PJBF (-0.212). FWD was incepted earlier than PJBF: FWD (2 years) vs PJBF (2 years). PJBF (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than FWD (0.65). FWD has a higher turnover PJBF (57.00) vs PJBF (57.00).
| FWD | PJBF | FWD / PJBF | |
| Gain YTD | 15.419 | -0.212 | -7,261% |
| Net Assets | 842M | 15.9M | 5,296% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.59 | 110% |
| Turnover | 163.00 | 57.00 | 286% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.15 | - |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FWD | PJBF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 72% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then APH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | +1.36% | ||
| APH - FWD | 82% Closely correlated | +1.40% | ||
| LITE - FWD | 80% Closely correlated | +3.02% | ||
| JCI - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | +1.56% | ||
| KLAC - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| LRCX - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | +0.42% | ||
More | ||||
PJBF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PJBF has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PJBF jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PJBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PJBF | 100% | N/A | ||
| NVDA - PJBF | 72% Closely correlated | +0.95% | ||
| CDNS - PJBF | 69% Closely correlated | +1.99% | ||
| LRCX - PJBF | 69% Closely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| TSM - PJBF | 68% Closely correlated | +3.38% | ||
| ANET - PJBF | 68% Closely correlated | +3.40% | ||
More | ||||