FWEDF
Price
$1.50
Change
+$0.04 (+2.74%)
Updated
May 21 closing price
Capitalization
136.86M
GCCFF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 14 closing price
Capitalization
1.31M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FWEDF vs GCCFF

Header iconFWEDF vs GCCFF Comparison
Open Charts FWEDF vs GCCFFBanner chart's image
Fireweed Metals
Price$1.50
Change+$0.04 (+2.74%)
Volume$69.31K
Capitalization136.86M
Golden Cariboo Resources
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.4K
Capitalization1.31M
FWEDF vs GCCFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
FWEDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FWEDF vs. GCCFF commentary
May 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWEDF is a StrongBuy and GCCFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 22, 2025
Stock price -- (FWEDF: $1.50 vs. GCCFF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: FWEDF and GCCFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FWEDF: 276% vs. GCCFF: 12%
Market capitalization -- FWEDF: $136.86M vs. GCCFF: $1.31M
FWEDF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $136.86M. GCCFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FWEDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGCCFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FWEDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GCCFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FWEDF is a better buy in the long-term than GCCFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FWEDF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FWEDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

FWEDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +7.93% price change this week, while GCCFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.50%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.24% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWEDF($137M) has a higher market cap than GCCFF($1.31M). FWEDF YTD gains are higher at: 55.000 vs. GCCFF (-35.714). GCCFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -271.43K vs. FWEDF (-18.65M). FWEDF has more cash in the bank: 37.1M vs. GCCFF (268K). GCCFF has less debt than FWEDF: GCCFF (10K) vs FWEDF (40K). FWEDF (0) and GCCFF (0) have equivalent revenues.
FWEDFGCCFFFWEDF / GCCFF
Capitalization137M1.31M10,426%
EBITDA-18.65M-271.43K6,873%
Gain YTD55.000-35.714-154%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash37.1M268K13,843%
Total Debt40K10K400%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FWEDF vs GCCFF: Fundamental Ratings
FWEDF
GCCFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
801
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1687
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3894
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10095
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7539

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GCCFF's Valuation (57) in the null industry is in the same range as FWEDF (66). This means that GCCFF’s stock grew similarly to FWEDF’s over the last 12 months.

FWEDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GCCFF (87). This means that FWEDF’s stock grew significantly faster than GCCFF’s over the last 12 months.

FWEDF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GCCFF (100). This means that FWEDF’s stock grew similarly to GCCFF’s over the last 12 months.

FWEDF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GCCFF (94). This means that FWEDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GCCFF’s over the last 12 months.

GCCFF's P/E Growth Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as FWEDF (100). This means that GCCFF’s stock grew similarly to FWEDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FWEDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FWEDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EITMX110.43N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Tx-Mgd Growth 1.1 I
TOLSX16.78N/A
N/A
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure S
FGLGX24.23N/A
N/A
Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock
TACLX19.58N/A
N/A
Touchstone Large Cap A
DLCEX21.90N/A
N/A
Dana Large Cap Equity Investor

FWEDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FWEDF and IVPAF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FWEDF and IVPAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FWEDF
1D Price
Change %
FWEDF100%
+2.98%
IVPAF - FWEDF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
CSCCF - FWEDF
27%
Poorly correlated
+3.64%
UEC - FWEDF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
NXE - FWEDF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
DNN - FWEDF
23%
Poorly correlated
+4.83%
More

GCCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GCCFF has been loosely correlated with BZDLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GCCFF jumps, then BZDLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GCCFF
1D Price
Change %
GCCFF100%
N/A
BZDLF - GCCFF
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CTJHY - GCCFF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GARWF - GCCFF
5%
Poorly correlated
+8.25%
FTMDF - GCCFF
2%
Poorly correlated
-6.52%
FWEDF - GCCFF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.98%
More