FWRG
Price
$18.04
Change
+$0.62 (+3.56%)
Updated
Jul 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.06B
35 days until earnings call
HOMB
Price
$29.73
Change
+$0.34 (+1.16%)
Updated
Jul 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.94B
8 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FWRG vs HOMB

Header iconFWRG vs HOMB Comparison
Open Charts FWRG vs HOMBBanner chart's image
First Watch Restaurant Group
Price$18.04
Change+$0.62 (+3.56%)
Volume$18.15K
Capitalization1.06B
Home BancShares
Price$29.73
Change+$0.34 (+1.16%)
Volume$14.78K
Capitalization4.94B
FWRG vs HOMB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FWRG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HOMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FWRG vs. HOMB commentary
Jul 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWRG is a Buy and HOMB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 09, 2025
Stock price -- (FWRG: $17.42 vs. HOMB: $29.39)
Brand notoriety: FWRG and HOMB are both not notable
FWRG represents the Restaurants, while HOMB is part of the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FWRG: 63% vs. HOMB: 115%
Market capitalization -- FWRG: $1.06B vs. HOMB: $4.94B
FWRG [@Restaurants] is valued at $1.06B. HOMB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $209.88B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.23B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FWRG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHOMB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FWRG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HOMB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HOMB is a better buy in the long-term than FWRG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FWRG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HOMB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FWRG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HOMB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HOMB is a better buy in the short-term than FWRG.

Price Growth

FWRG (@Restaurants) experienced а +8.60% price change this week, while HOMB (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.07%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

FWRG is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

HOMB is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.06% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

@Regional Banks (+1.28% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HOMB($4.94B) has a higher market cap than FWRG($1.06B). FWRG has higher P/E ratio than HOMB: FWRG (102.47) vs HOMB (12.42). HOMB YTD gains are higher at: 5.215 vs. FWRG (-6.394). HOMB has more cash in the bank: 226M vs. FWRG (18.6M). FWRG has less debt than HOMB: FWRG (837M) vs HOMB (1.74B). FWRG has higher revenues than HOMB: FWRG (1.06B) vs HOMB (978M).
FWRGHOMBFWRG / HOMB
Capitalization1.06B4.94B22%
EBITDA91.9MN/A-
Gain YTD-6.3945.215-123%
P/E Ratio102.4712.42825%
Revenue1.06B978M108%
Total Cash18.6M226M8%
Total Debt837M1.74B48%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HOMB: Fundamental Ratings
HOMB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
10
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
17
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FWRGHOMB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FWRG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HOMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MFMPX16.78N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Next Gen Em Mkts A
SDLAX19.76N/A
N/A
SEI Dynamic Asset Allocation A (SIIT)
SCNUX11.52-0.06
-0.52%
Invesco Income Advantage U.S. Fund Inv
VSCAX23.88-0.27
-1.12%
Invesco Small Cap Value A
IHSSX25.04-0.35
-1.38%
Hartford Small Company R4

FWRG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWRG has been loosely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FWRG jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FWRG
1D Price
Change %
FWRG100%
-1.36%
CAKE - FWRG
50%
Loosely correlated
-3.30%
FRSH - FWRG
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.32%
KRUS - FWRG
49%
Loosely correlated
-5.38%
DIN - FWRG
47%
Loosely correlated
-4.37%
DRI - FWRG
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.93%
More

HOMB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HOMB has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HOMB jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HOMB
1D Price
Change %
HOMB100%
-1.41%
FNB - HOMB
92%
Closely correlated
-0.39%
UBSI - HOMB
91%
Closely correlated
-1.64%
FFBC - HOMB
91%
Closely correlated
-1.43%
FBK - HOMB
91%
Closely correlated
-1.49%
HWC - HOMB
91%
Closely correlated
-1.83%
More