FWRG
Price
$17.66
Change
+$0.10 (+0.57%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.07B
39 days until earnings call
SSPPF
Price
$2.15
Change
+$0.07 (+3.37%)
Updated
May 28 closing price
Capitalization
2.05B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FWRG vs SSPPF

Header iconFWRG vs SSPPF Comparison
Open Charts FWRG vs SSPPFBanner chart's image
First Watch Restaurant Group
Price$17.66
Change+$0.10 (+0.57%)
Volume$370.24K
Capitalization1.07B
SSP Group
Price$2.15
Change+$0.07 (+3.37%)
Volume$1.42K
Capitalization2.05B
FWRG vs SSPPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FWRG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SSPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FWRG vs. SSPPF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWRG is a Buy and SSPPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (FWRG: $17.66 vs. SSPPF: $2.15)
Brand notoriety: FWRG and SSPPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FWRG: 35% vs. SSPPF: 136%
Market capitalization -- FWRG: $1.07B vs. SSPPF: $2.05B
FWRG [@Restaurants] is valued at $1.07B. SSPPF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $2.05B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $210.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FWRG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSSPPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FWRG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SSPPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FWRG is a better buy in the long-term than SSPPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FWRG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SSPPF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FWRG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SSPPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SSPPF is a better buy in the short-term than FWRG.

Price Growth

FWRG (@Restaurants) experienced а +7.29% price change this week, while SSPPF (@Restaurants) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

FWRG is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

SSPPF is expected to report earnings on May 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+2.15% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSPPF($2.05B) has a higher market cap than FWRG($1.07B). FWRG has higher P/E ratio than SSPPF: FWRG (103.88) vs SSPPF (46.06). FWRG YTD gains are higher at: -5.105 vs. SSPPF (-15.686). SSPPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 588M vs. FWRG (91.9M). SSPPF has more cash in the bank: 207M vs. FWRG (18.6M). FWRG has less debt than SSPPF: FWRG (837M) vs SSPPF (2.11B). SSPPF has higher revenues than FWRG: SSPPF (3.58B) vs FWRG (1.06B).
FWRGSSPPFFWRG / SSPPF
Capitalization1.07B2.05B52%
EBITDA91.9M588M16%
Gain YTD-5.105-15.68633%
P/E Ratio103.8846.06226%
Revenue1.06B3.58B30%
Total Cash18.6M207M9%
Total Debt837M2.11B40%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SSPPF: Fundamental Ratings
SSPPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
46
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
76
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FWRGSSPPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FWRG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SSPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MOPCX19.270.17
+0.89%
NYLI WMC Small Companies Class C
VLAAX42.560.32
+0.76%
Value Line Asset Allocation Investor
MVCCX28.92N/A
N/A
MFS Mid Cap Value C
CRBRX13.35N/A
N/A
Columbia Acorn Inst2
WALSX13.65N/A
N/A
Wasatch Long/Short Alpha Investor

FWRG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWRG has been loosely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FWRG jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FWRG
1D Price
Change %
FWRG100%
+0.57%
CAKE - FWRG
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
FRSH - FWRG
49%
Loosely correlated
+3.05%
KRUS - FWRG
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.69%
DIN - FWRG
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.96%
DRI - FWRG
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.43%
More

SSPPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SSPPF and PZRIF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SSPPF and PZRIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SSPPF
1D Price
Change %
SSPPF100%
N/A
PZRIF - SSPPF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
BROS - SSPPF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.77%
FWRG - SSPPF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
SIRZF - SSPPF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALSSF - SSPPF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More