Ad is loading...
FWTFX vs RNPFX
FWTFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWTFX vs RNPFX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide M
Price$30.19
Change+$2.42 (+8.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.95B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$58.62
Change+$4.27 (+7.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.16B
FWTFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWTFX vs. RNPFX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWTFX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 132B vs. FWTFX (2.95B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than FWTFX: RNPFX (0.84) vs FWTFX (0.35). FWTFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWTFX (16 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). FWTFX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). FWTFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). FWTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWTFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.46 vs. FWTFX (-20.99). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.03 vs. FWTFX (15.71).
| FWTFX | RNPFX | FWTFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.46 | 267% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.46 | 267% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -17.621 | -12.395 | 142% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.95B | 132B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.84 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.99 | -9.46 | 222% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.24 | -5.29 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.71 | 37.03 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.85 | 43.41 | 43% |