Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWTFX vs RNPFX
FWTFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWTFX vs RNPFX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide M
Price$33.92
Change+$0.33 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.08B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$67.65
Change+$0.41 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.13B
FWTFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWTFX vs. RNPFX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWTFX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 150B vs. FWTFX (3.08B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than FWTFX: RNPFX (0.77) vs FWTFX (0.33). FWTFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWTFX (16 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). FWTFX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). FWTFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). FWTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWTFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.62 vs. FWTFX (-8.04). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.31 vs. FWTFX (17.19).
| FWTFX | RNPFX | FWTFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.46 | 267% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.46 | 267% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.356 | 9.043 | -4% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.08B | 150B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.77 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.04 | 9.62 | -84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.68 | 29.60 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.19 | 45.31 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.49 | 80.12 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement