Ad is loading...
FWTFX vs RNPFX
FWTFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWTFX vs RNPFX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide M
Price$31.80
Change+$0.04 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.91B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$63.52
Change+$0.12 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets142.07B
FWTFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWTFX vs. RNPFX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWTFX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 142B vs. FWTFX (2.91B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than FWTFX: RNPFX (0.82) vs FWTFX (0.35). FWTFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWTFX (16 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). FWTFX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). FWTFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). FWTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWTFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.68 vs. FWTFX (-10.37). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 48.27 vs. FWTFX (20.46).
| FWTFX | RNPFX | FWTFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.46 | 267% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.46 | 267% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.408 | 2.386 | -269% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.91B | 142B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.82 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.37 | 5.68 | -183% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.17 | 28.41 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.46 | 48.27 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.49 | 66.66 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...