Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWTFX vs RNPFX
FWTFX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts FWTFX vs RNPFX
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide M
Price$37.48
Change-$0.46 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.57B
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$72.44
Change-$0.08 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.87B
FWTFX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWTFX vs. RNPFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWTFX is a Hold and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. FWTFX (3.57B). RNPFX pays higher dividends than FWTFX: RNPFX (0.69) vs FWTFX (0.28). FWTFX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: FWTFX (17 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). FWTFX (1.23) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). FWTFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). FWTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPFX: FWTFX (0) vs RNPFX (250). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.05 vs. FWTFX (-3.50). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.33 vs. FWTFX (11.61).
| FWTFX | RNPFX | FWTFX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.46 | 267% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.46 | 267% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.184 | 16.763 | 67% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.57B | 159B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.69 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.50 | 12.05 | -29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.02 | 47.14 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.61 | 28.33 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.32 | 90.02 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers