Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWFX vs RNPEX
FWWFX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts FWWFX vs RNPEX
Fidelity Worldwide
Price$34.76
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.08B
American Funds New Perspective R4
Price$65.93
Change-$0.25 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.71B
FWWFX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWFX vs. RNPEX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWFX is a Buy and RNPEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 151B vs. FWWFX (3.08B). FWWFX pays higher dividends than RNPEX: FWWFX (0.76) vs RNPEX (0.51). FWWFX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: FWWFX (35 years) vs RNPEX (23 years). RNPEX (0.76) is less costly to investors than FWWFX (0.69). FWWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPEX (24.00). FWWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPEX: FWWFX (0) vs RNPEX (250). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.15 vs. FWWFX (-7.76). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 43.11 vs. FWWFX (21.07).
| FWWFX | RNPEX | FWWFX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.76 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.76 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.115 | 8.652 | -1% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.08B | 151B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.51 | 149% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.76 | 9.15 | -85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.32 | 29.10 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.07 | 43.11 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.95 | 76.64 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement