Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWFX vs RNPEX
FWWFX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts FWWFX vs RNPEX
Fidelity Worldwide
Price$36.99
Change+$0.21 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.28B
American Funds New Perspective R4
Price$68.79
Change+$0.38 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets155.36B
FWWFX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWFX vs. RNPEX commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWFX is a Buy and RNPEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 155B vs. FWWFX (3.28B). FWWFX pays higher dividends than RNPEX: FWWFX (0.72) vs RNPEX (0.49). FWWFX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: FWWFX (35 years) vs RNPEX (23 years). RNPEX (0.76) is less costly to investors than FWWFX (0.69). FWWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPEX (24.00). FWWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPEX: FWWFX (0) vs RNPEX (250). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.16 vs. FWWFX (-4.12). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 45.45 vs. FWWFX (25.18).
| FWWFX | RNPEX | FWWFX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.76 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.76 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.690 | 12.937 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.28B | 155B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 0.49 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.12 | 11.16 | -37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.92 | 46.05 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.18 | 45.45 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.39 | 85.85 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers