Ad is loading...
FWWFX vs RNPEX
FWWFX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts FWWFX vs RNPEX
Fidelity Worldwide
Price$31.00
Change-$1.51 (-4.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.95B
American Funds New Perspective R4
Price$58.01
Change-$2.40 (-3.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.04B
FWWFX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWFX vs. RNPEX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWFX is a Hold and RNPEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. FWWFX (2.95B). FWWFX pays higher dividends than RNPEX: FWWFX (0.81) vs RNPEX (0.56). FWWFX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: FWWFX (35 years) vs RNPEX (23 years). RNPEX (0.76) is less costly to investors than FWWFX (0.69). FWWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPEX (24.00). FWWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPEX: FWWFX (0) vs RNPEX (250). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.25 vs. FWWFX (-10.36). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 68.44 vs. FWWFX (48.98).
| FWWFX | RNPEX | FWWFX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.76 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.76 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.580 | -0.821 | 802% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.95B | 139B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 0.56 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.36 | 2.25 | -460% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.38 | 2.32 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.98 | 68.44 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.18 | 61.92 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers