Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWFX vs RNPEX
FWWFX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts FWWFX vs RNPEX
Fidelity Worldwide
Price$39.90
Change-$0.39 (-0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.51B
American Funds New Perspective R4
Price$73.06
Change+$0.41 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.4B
FWWFX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWFX vs. RNPEX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWFX is a Buy and RNPEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. FWWFX (3.51B). FWWFX pays higher dividends than RNPEX: FWWFX (0.67) vs RNPEX (0.46). FWWFX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: FWWFX (35 years) vs RNPEX (23 years). RNPEX (0.76) is less costly to investors than FWWFX (0.69). FWWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPEX (24.00). FWWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPEX: FWWFX (0) vs RNPEX (250). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.85 vs. FWWFX (0.80). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 35.13 vs. FWWFX (18.93).
| FWWFX | RNPEX | FWWFX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.76 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.76 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.655 | 19.947 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.51B | 164B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 0.46 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.80 | 13.85 | 6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.82 | 64.22 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.93 | 35.13 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.51 | 100.25 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers