Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWFX vs RNPEX
FWWFX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts FWWFX vs RNPEX
Fidelity Worldwide
Price$39.73
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.38B
American Funds New Perspective R4
Price$71.95
Change-$0.20 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.63B
FWWFX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWFX vs. RNPEX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWFX is a StrongBuy and RNPEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. FWWFX (3.39B). FWWFX pays higher dividends than RNPEX: FWWFX (0.69) vs RNPEX (0.48). FWWFX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: FWWFX (35 years) vs RNPEX (23 years). RNPEX (0.76) is less costly to investors than FWWFX (0.69). FWWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPEX (24.00). FWWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPEX: FWWFX (0) vs RNPEX (250). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.70 vs. FWWFX (4.68). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 38.75 vs. FWWFX (24.44).
| FWWFX | RNPEX | FWWFX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.76 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.76 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.167 | 18.125 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.39B | 163B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.48 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.68 | 14.70 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.25 | 51.36 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.44 | 38.75 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.14 | 101.17 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement