Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWFX vs RNPEX
FWWFX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts FWWFX vs RNPEX
Fidelity Worldwide
Price$38.30
Change+$0.19 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.37B
American Funds New Perspective R4
Price$69.51
Change+$0.21 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.96B
FWWFX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWFX vs. RNPEX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWFX is a StrongBuy and RNPEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 157B vs. FWWFX (3.37B). FWWFX pays higher dividends than RNPEX: FWWFX (0.70) vs RNPEX (0.49). FWWFX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: FWWFX (35 years) vs RNPEX (23 years). RNPEX (0.76) is less costly to investors than FWWFX (0.69). FWWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. RNPEX (24.00). FWWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNPEX: FWWFX (0) vs RNPEX (250). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.87 vs. FWWFX (6.63). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 37.67 vs. FWWFX (20.91).
| FWWFX | RNPEX | FWWFX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.76 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.76 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.511 | 14.119 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.37B | 157B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.49 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.63 | 16.87 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.98 | 37.77 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.91 | 37.67 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.75 | 84.12 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement