Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWMX vs HWLZX
FWWMX vs HWLZX Comparison
Open Charts FWWMX vs HWLZX
American Funds Washington Mutual 529-F-3
Price$66.05
Change-$0.23 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.42B
Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Fdml Value Z
Price$45.58
Change+$0.13 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets347.29M
FWWMX vs HWLZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. HWLZX (347M). HWLZX pays higher dividends than FWWMX: HWLZX (1.50) vs FWWMX (1.41). FWWMX was incepted earlier than HWLZX: FWWMX (5 years) vs HWLZX (6 years). HWLZX (0.85) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). HWLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FWWMX (29.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWLZX: FWWMX (250) vs HWLZX (1000000). FWWMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.03 vs. HWLZX (-3.02). FWWMX (47.75) and HWLZX (47.17) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FWWMX | HWLZX | FWWMX / HWLZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.85 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.85 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.539 | 10.209 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 204B | 347M | 58,790% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 1.50 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.03 | -3.02 | -134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.52 | 8.81 | 346% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.75 | 47.17 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement