Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWNX vs FZEMX
FWWNX vs FZEMX Comparison
Open Charts FWWNX vs FZEMX
FWWNX vs FZEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWNX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. FZEMX (11.5B). FWWNX pays higher dividends than FZEMX: FWWNX (1.21) vs FZEMX (0.05). FWWNX was incepted earlier than FZEMX: FWWNX (6 years) vs FZEMX (5 years). FZEMX (0.73) is less costly to investors than FWWNX (0.62). FWWNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FZEMX (31.00). FZEMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWNX: FZEMX (0) vs FWWNX (250). FZEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.11 vs. FWWNX (27.84). FZEMX return over 5 years is better than : 33.51 vs. FWWNX (21.21).
| FWWNX | FZEMX | FWWNX / FZEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.73 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.73 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.419 | 23.483 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.9B | 11.5B | 790% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 0.05 | 2,267% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.84 | 49.11 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.75 | 75.73 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.21 | 33.51 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers