Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FWWNX vs REMAX
FWWNX vs REMAX Comparison
Open Charts FWWNX vs REMAX
FWWNX vs REMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FWWNX vs. REMAX commentary
Sep 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FWWNX is a Buy and REMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWNX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. REMAX (1.3B). REMAX pays higher dividends than FWWNX: REMAX (1.42) vs FWWNX (1.21). FWWNX was incepted earlier than REMAX: FWWNX (6 years) vs REMAX (20 years). REMAX (1.54) is less costly to investors than FWWNX (0.62). REMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FWWNX (46.00). REMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWNX: REMAX (0) vs FWWNX (250). REMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.61 vs. FWWNX (19.94). REMAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.31 vs. FWWNX (21.19).
| FWWNX | REMAX | FWWNX / REMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.42 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.54 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.145 | 26.156 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90B | 1.3B | 6,923% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.42 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.94 | 34.61 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.76 | 88.77 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.19 | 27.31 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 77.00 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers