Ad is loading...
FXAIX vs HGICX
FXAIX vs HGICX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs HGICX
FXAIX vs HGICX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. HGICX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Hold and HGICX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 619B vs. HGICX (10.8B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than HGICX: FXAIX (1.31) vs HGICX (0.11). FXAIX was incepted earlier than HGICX: FXAIX (14 years) vs HGICX (26 years). HGICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGICX: FXAIX (0) vs HGICX (2000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.15 vs. HGICX (15.01). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 94.81 vs. HGICX (44.55).
| FXAIX | HGICX | FXAIX / HGICX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.013 | 1.501 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 619B | 10.8B | 5,731% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.11 | 1,187% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.15 | 15.01 | 181% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.22 | 10.90 | 341% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.81 | 44.55 | 213% |
| Returns for 10 years | 222.48 | 129.42 | 172% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...