Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs HGICX
FXAIX vs HGICX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs HGICX
FXAIX vs HGICX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. HGICX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and HGICX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 682B vs. HGICX (11.1B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than HGICX: FXAIX (1.19) vs HGICX (0.00). FXAIX was incepted earlier than HGICX: FXAIX (14 years) vs HGICX (27 years). HGICX (1.45) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). HGICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGICX: FXAIX (0) vs HGICX (2000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.40 vs. HGICX (4.40). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 98.97 vs. HGICX (48.07).
| FXAIX | HGICX | FXAIX / HGICX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.45 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.45 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.106 | 8.746 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 682B | 11.1B | 6,144% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.40 | 4.40 | 395% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.09 | 35.45 | 192% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.97 | 48.07 | 206% |
| Returns for 10 years | 260.49 | 139.24 | 187% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers