Ad is loading...
FXAIX vs HGISX
FXAIX vs HGISX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs HGISX
FXAIX vs HGISX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. HGISX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and HGISX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 598B vs. HGISX (9.8B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than HGISX: FXAIX (1.30) vs HGISX (0.31). FXAIX was incepted earlier than HGISX: FXAIX (14 years) vs HGISX (18 years). HGISX (0.75) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). HGISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX (0) and HGISX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.10 vs. HGISX (0.59). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 108.69 vs. HGISX (65.52).
| FXAIX | HGISX | FXAIX / HGISX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.75 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.75 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.393 | -6.133 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 598B | 9.8B | 6,103% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.31 | 420% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.10 | 0.59 | 1,719% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.52 | 18.84 | 199% |
| Returns for 5 years | 108.69 | 65.52 | 166% |
| Returns for 10 years | 183.80 | 120.69 | 152% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...