Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs LAMCX
FXAIX vs LAMCX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs LAMCX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth C
Price$23.27
Change+$0.13 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.32B
FXAIX vs LAMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. LAMCX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and LAMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 634B vs. LAMCX (4.32B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than LAMCX: FXAIX (1.26) vs LAMCX (0.00). FXAIX was incepted earlier than LAMCX: FXAIX (14 years) vs LAMCX (24 years). LAMCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). LAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAMCX: FXAIX (0) vs LAMCX (1000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.68 vs. LAMCX (6.64). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 118.26 vs. LAMCX (58.85).
| FXAIX | LAMCX | FXAIX / LAMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.64 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.64 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.229 | 4.328 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 634B | 4.32B | 14,683% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.68 | 6.64 | 191% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.41 | 36.80 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 118.26 | 58.85 | 201% |
| Returns for 10 years | 223.41 | 67.25 | 332% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement