Ad is loading...
FXAIX vs LAMCX
FXAIX vs LAMCX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs LAMCX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth C
Price$24.10
Change-$0.03 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FXAIX vs LAMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. LAMCX commentary
Nov 14, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and LAMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 593B vs. LAMCX (4.39B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than LAMCX: FXAIX (1.31) vs LAMCX (0.08). FXAIX was incepted earlier than LAMCX: FXAIX (14 years) vs LAMCX (23 years). LAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAMCX: FXAIX (0) vs LAMCX (1000). FXAIX (35.01) and LAMCX (34.22) have marching annual gain over last year. FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 106.23 vs. LAMCX (51.30).
| FXAIX | LAMCX | FXAIX / LAMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.958 | 26.401 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 593B | 4.39B | 13,517% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.08 | 1,698% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.01 | 34.22 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.85 | 12.34 | 274% |
| Returns for 5 years | 106.23 | 51.30 | 207% |
| Returns for 10 years | 218.70 | 51.39 | 426% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...