Ad is loading...
FXAIX vs LAMCX
FXAIX vs LAMCX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs LAMCX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth C
Price$21.94
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.1B
FXAIX vs LAMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. LAMCX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and LAMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 594B vs. LAMCX (4.1B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than LAMCX: FXAIX (1.34) vs LAMCX (0.00). FXAIX was incepted earlier than LAMCX: FXAIX (14 years) vs LAMCX (23 years). LAMCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). LAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAMCX: FXAIX (0) vs LAMCX (1000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.99 vs. LAMCX (5.89). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 108.40 vs. LAMCX (55.84).
| FXAIX | LAMCX | FXAIX / LAMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.64 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.64 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.366 | -1.082 | 311% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 594B | 4.1B | 14,477% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.99 | 5.89 | 170% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.07 | 28.95 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 108.40 | 55.84 | 194% |
| Returns for 10 years | 194.80 | 53.42 | 365% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers