Ad is loading...
FXAIX vs LAMCX
FXAIX vs LAMCX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs LAMCX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth C
Price$22.66
Change+$0.16 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.27B
FXAIX vs LAMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. LAMCX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Hold and LAMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 619B vs. LAMCX (4.27B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than LAMCX: FXAIX (1.31) vs LAMCX (0.08). FXAIX was incepted earlier than LAMCX: FXAIX (14 years) vs LAMCX (23 years). LAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAMCX: FXAIX (0) vs LAMCX (1000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.15 vs. LAMCX (18.51). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 94.81 vs. LAMCX (40.62).
| FXAIX | LAMCX | FXAIX / LAMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.013 | 2.164 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 619B | 4.27B | 14,510% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.08 | 1,698% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.15 | 18.51 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.22 | 18.31 | 203% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.81 | 40.62 | 233% |
| Returns for 10 years | 222.48 | 60.63 | 367% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...