Ad is loading...
FXAIX vs LAMCX
FXAIX vs LAMCX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs LAMCX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth C
Price$20.48
Change-$0.54 (-2.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.94B
FXAIX vs LAMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. LAMCX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Hold and LAMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 598B vs. LAMCX (3.94B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than LAMCX: FXAIX (1.30) vs LAMCX (0.00). FXAIX was incepted earlier than LAMCX: FXAIX (14 years) vs LAMCX (23 years). LAMCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). LAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAMCX: FXAIX (0) vs LAMCX (1000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.13 vs. LAMCX (2.04). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 111.09 vs. LAMCX (54.00).
| FXAIX | LAMCX | FXAIX / LAMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.65 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.65 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.913 | -5.230 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 598B | 3.94B | 15,174% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.13 | 2.04 | 350% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.44 | 12.63 | 233% |
| Returns for 5 years | 111.09 | 54.00 | 206% |
| Returns for 10 years | 185.32 | 46.58 | 398% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers