Ad is loading...
FXAIX vs LAMFX
FXAIX vs LAMFX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs LAMFX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth F
Price$21.26
Change+$0.03 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.88B
FXAIX vs LAMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. LAMFX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and LAMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 598B vs. LAMFX (3.88B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than LAMFX: FXAIX (1.30) vs LAMFX (0.80). FXAIX was incepted earlier than LAMFX: FXAIX (14 years) vs LAMFX (18 years). LAMFX (0.75) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). LAMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX (0) and LAMFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.59 vs. LAMFX (3.85). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 98.36 vs. LAMFX (53.72).
| FXAIX | LAMFX | FXAIX / LAMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.65 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.75 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.851 | -6.508 | 151% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 598B | 3.88B | 15,432% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.80 | 162% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.59 | 3.85 | 171% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.93 | 14.64 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.36 | 53.72 | 183% |
| Returns for 10 years | 175.23 | 54.55 | 321% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...