Ad is loading...
FXAIX vs LAMFX
FXAIX vs LAMFX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs LAMFX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth F
Price$22.58
Change+$0.05 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.1B
FXAIX vs LAMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. LAMFX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and LAMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 594B vs. LAMFX (4.1B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than LAMFX: FXAIX (1.34) vs LAMFX (0.81). FXAIX was incepted earlier than LAMFX: FXAIX (14 years) vs LAMFX (18 years). LAMFX (0.74) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). LAMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX (0) and LAMFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.00 vs. LAMFX (7.34). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 107.31 vs. LAMFX (61.77).
| FXAIX | LAMFX | FXAIX / LAMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.64 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.74 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.872 | -0.923 | 419% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 594B | 4.1B | 14,495% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 0.81 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.00 | 7.34 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.66 | 32.03 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 107.31 | 61.77 | 174% |
| Returns for 10 years | 192.42 | 64.22 | 300% |