Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs LAMFX
FXAIX vs LAMFX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs LAMFX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth F
Price$24.75
Change+$0.12 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.47B
FXAIX vs LAMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. LAMFX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and LAMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 666B vs. LAMFX (4.47B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than LAMFX: FXAIX (1.20) vs LAMFX (0.75). FXAIX was incepted earlier than LAMFX: FXAIX (14 years) vs LAMFX (18 years). LAMFX (0.74) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). LAMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX (0) and LAMFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.40 vs. LAMFX (11.10). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 113.24 vs. LAMFX (59.53).
| FXAIX | LAMFX | FXAIX / LAMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.64 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.74 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.947 | 8.531 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 666B | 4.47B | 14,913% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.75 | 160% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.40 | 11.10 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.71 | 44.04 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 113.24 | 59.53 | 190% |
| Returns for 10 years | 233.91 | 85.61 | 273% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement