Ad is loading...
FXAIX vs LAMQX
FXAIX vs LAMQX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs LAMQX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth R2
Price$21.74
Change+$1.58 (+7.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.65B
FXAIX vs LAMQX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. LAMQX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and LAMQX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 598B vs. LAMQX (3.65B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than LAMQX: FXAIX (1.30) vs LAMQX (0.31). FXAIX was incepted earlier than LAMQX: FXAIX (14 years) vs LAMQX (18 years). LAMQX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). LAMQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX (0) and LAMQX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.10 vs. LAMQX (-5.76). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 92.75 vs. LAMQX (45.61).
| FXAIX | LAMQX | FXAIX / LAMQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.25 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.25 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.000 | -11.999 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 598B | 3.65B | 16,370% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.31 | 424% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.10 | -5.76 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.20 | 4.11 | 395% |
| Returns for 5 years | 92.75 | 45.61 | 203% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.34 | 40.51 | 393% |