Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs LAMQX
FXAIX vs LAMQX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs LAMQX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth R2
Price$23.64
Change+$0.10 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.25B
FXAIX vs LAMQX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. LAMQX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and LAMQX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 634B vs. LAMQX (4.25B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than LAMQX: FXAIX (1.26) vs LAMQX (0.29). FXAIX was incepted earlier than LAMQX: FXAIX (14 years) vs LAMQX (18 years). LAMQX (1.24) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). LAMQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX (0) and LAMQX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.43 vs. LAMQX (7.19). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 100.49 vs. LAMQX (49.57).
| FXAIX | LAMQX | FXAIX / LAMQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.24 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.24 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.537 | 2.755 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 634B | 4.25B | 14,921% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 0.29 | 427% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.43 | 7.19 | 173% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.35 | 28.60 | 173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 100.49 | 49.57 | 203% |
| Returns for 10 years | 212.02 | 68.76 | 308% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement