Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs LAMRX
FXAIX vs LAMRX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs LAMRX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth R3
Price$24.35
Change+$0.12 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.49B
FXAIX vs LAMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. LAMRX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and LAMRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 666B vs. LAMRX (4.49B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than LAMRX: FXAIX (1.20) vs LAMRX (0.40). FXAIX was incepted earlier than LAMRX: FXAIX (14 years) vs LAMRX (18 years). LAMRX (1.14) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). LAMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX (0) and LAMRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.88 vs. LAMRX (11.01). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 114.10 vs. LAMRX (56.94).
| FXAIX | LAMRX | FXAIX / LAMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.14 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.14 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.386 | 8.765 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 666B | 4.49B | 14,840% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.40 | 301% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.88 | 11.01 | 181% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.40 | 42.66 | 165% |
| Returns for 5 years | 114.10 | 56.94 | 200% |
| Returns for 10 years | 235.25 | 79.59 | 296% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement