Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs LAMRX
FXAIX vs LAMRX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs LAMRX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth R3
Price$24.67
Change+$0.15 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.54B
FXAIX vs LAMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. LAMRX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and LAMRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 696B vs. LAMRX (4.54B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than LAMRX: FXAIX (1.16) vs LAMRX (0.38). FXAIX was incepted earlier than LAMRX: FXAIX (14 years) vs LAMRX (18 years). LAMRX (1.14) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). LAMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX (0) and LAMRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.32 vs. LAMRX (9.44). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 103.70 vs. LAMRX (51.99).
| FXAIX | LAMRX | FXAIX / LAMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.14 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.14 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.170 | 10.194 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 696B | 4.54B | 15,337% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 0.38 | 303% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.32 | 9.44 | 205% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.35 | 44.28 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 103.70 | 51.99 | 199% |
| Returns for 10 years | 261.06 | 90.41 | 289% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement