Ad is loading...
FXAIX vs LAMRX
FXAIX vs LAMRX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs LAMRX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth R3
Price$22.22
Change+$0.05 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.1B
FXAIX vs LAMRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. LAMRX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and LAMRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 594B vs. LAMRX (4.1B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than LAMRX: FXAIX (1.34) vs LAMRX (0.42). FXAIX was incepted earlier than LAMRX: FXAIX (14 years) vs LAMRX (18 years). LAMRX (1.14) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). LAMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX (0) and LAMRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.00 vs. LAMRX (6.78). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 107.31 vs. LAMRX (58.47).
| FXAIX | LAMRX | FXAIX / LAMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.14 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.14 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.872 | -1.086 | 357% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 594B | 4.1B | 14,495% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 0.42 | 318% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.00 | 6.78 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.66 | 30.19 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 107.31 | 58.47 | 184% |
| Returns for 10 years | 192.42 | 58.28 | 330% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...