Ad is loading...
FXAIX vs LAMRX
FXAIX vs LAMRX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs LAMRX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth R3
Price$20.92
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.88B
FXAIX vs LAMRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. LAMRX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and LAMRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 598B vs. LAMRX (3.88B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than LAMRX: FXAIX (1.30) vs LAMRX (0.42). FXAIX was incepted earlier than LAMRX: FXAIX (14 years) vs LAMRX (18 years). LAMRX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). LAMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX (0) and LAMRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.59 vs. LAMRX (3.24). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 98.36 vs. LAMRX (50.48).
| FXAIX | LAMRX | FXAIX / LAMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.15 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.15 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.851 | -6.663 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 598B | 3.88B | 15,432% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.42 | 311% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.59 | 3.24 | 204% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.93 | 13.01 | 199% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.36 | 50.48 | 195% |
| Returns for 10 years | 175.23 | 48.96 | 358% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...