Ad is loading...
FXAIX vs LAMRX
FXAIX vs LAMRX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs LAMRX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth R3
Price$21.70
Change-$0.18 (-0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.08B
FXAIX vs LAMRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. LAMRX commentary
Mar 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Hold and LAMRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 632B vs. LAMRX (4.08B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than LAMRX: FXAIX (1.23) vs LAMRX (0.40). FXAIX was incepted earlier than LAMRX: FXAIX (14 years) vs LAMRX (17 years). LAMRX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). LAMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX (0) and LAMRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.18 vs. LAMRX (5.44). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 144.54 vs. LAMRX (80.11).
| FXAIX | LAMRX | FXAIX / LAMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.15 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.15 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.305 | -2.496 | 172% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 632B | 4.08B | 15,505% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 0.40 | 308% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.18 | 5.44 | 205% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.80 | 22.57 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 144.54 | 80.11 | 180% |
| Returns for 10 years | 196.84 | 58.80 | 335% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...