Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs LAMRX
FXAIX vs LAMRX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs LAMRX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth R3
Price$25.28
Change+$0.03 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.63B
FXAIX vs LAMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. LAMRX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Hold and LAMRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 723B vs. LAMRX (4.63B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than LAMRX: FXAIX (1.12) vs LAMRX (0.39). FXAIX was incepted earlier than LAMRX: FXAIX (14 years) vs LAMRX (18 years). LAMRX (1.14) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). LAMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX (0) and LAMRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.93 vs. LAMRX (4.93). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 104.83 vs. LAMRX (50.19).
| FXAIX | LAMRX | FXAIX / LAMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.14 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.14 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.832 | 12.903 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 723B | 4.63B | 15,619% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.39 | 288% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.93 | 4.93 | 303% |
| Returns for 3 years | 86.18 | 53.87 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 104.83 | 50.19 | 209% |
| Returns for 10 years | 259.62 | 89.58 | 290% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers