Ad is loading...
FXAIX vs LAMSX
FXAIX vs LAMSX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs LAMSX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth R4
Price$21.39
Change+$1.55 (+7.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.65B
FXAIX vs LAMSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. LAMSX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and LAMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 598B vs. LAMSX (3.65B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than LAMSX: FXAIX (1.30) vs LAMSX (0.65). FXAIX was incepted earlier than LAMSX: FXAIX (14 years) vs LAMSX (10 years). LAMSX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). LAMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX (0) and LAMSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.10 vs. LAMSX (-5.48). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 92.75 vs. LAMSX (46.84).
| FXAIX | LAMSX | FXAIX / LAMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.90 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.90 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.000 | -11.937 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 598B | 3.65B | 16,370% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.65 | 200% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.10 | -5.48 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.20 | 4.79 | 338% |
| Returns for 5 years | 92.75 | 46.84 | 198% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.34 | N/A | - |