Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs LAMSX
FXAIX vs LAMSX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs LAMSX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth R4
Price$24.12
Change+$0.08 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.4B
FXAIX vs LAMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. LAMSX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and LAMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 666B vs. LAMSX (4.4B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than LAMSX: FXAIX (1.20) vs LAMSX (0.61). FXAIX was incepted earlier than LAMSX: FXAIX (14 years) vs LAMSX (10 years). LAMSX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). LAMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX (0) and LAMSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.62 vs. LAMSX (5.72). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 108.65 vs. LAMSX (55.36).
| FXAIX | LAMSX | FXAIX / LAMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.89 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.89 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.887 | 6.883 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 666B | 4.4B | 15,123% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.61 | 197% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.62 | 5.72 | 203% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.03 | 43.42 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 108.65 | 55.36 | 196% |
| Returns for 10 years | 222.53 | 76.81 | 290% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement