Ad is loading...
FXAIX vs LCCAX
FXAIX vs LCCAX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs LCCAX
Columbia Contrarian Core A
Price$31.25
Change+$0.13 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.88B
FXAIX vs LCCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. LCCAX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and LCCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 598B vs. LCCAX (12.9B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than LCCAX: FXAIX (1.30) vs LCCAX (0.33). FXAIX was incepted earlier than LCCAX: FXAIX (14 years) vs LCCAX (26 years). LCCAX (0.99) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). LCCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCCAX: FXAIX (0) vs LCCAX (2000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.45 vs. LCCAX (-5.61). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 98.09 vs. LCCAX (29.30).
| FXAIX | LCCAX | FXAIX / LCCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.99 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.99 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.974 | -11.009 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 598B | 12.9B | 4,636% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.33 | 392% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.45 | -5.61 | -115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.76 | 1.54 | 1,674% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.09 | 29.30 | 335% |
| Returns for 10 years | 174.86 | 44.00 | 397% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...