Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs LCCAX
FXAIX vs LCCAX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs LCCAX
Columbia Contrarian Core A
Price$35.87
Change+$0.35 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.57B
FXAIX vs LCCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. LCCAX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and LCCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 634B vs. LCCAX (14.6B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than LCCAX: FXAIX (1.26) vs LCCAX (0.32). FXAIX was incepted earlier than LCCAX: FXAIX (14 years) vs LCCAX (27 years). LCCAX (0.99) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). LCCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCCAX: FXAIX (0) vs LCCAX (2000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.43 vs. LCCAX (0.22). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 100.49 vs. LCCAX (32.94).
| FXAIX | LCCAX | FXAIX / LCCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.99 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.99 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.537 | 1.573 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 634B | 14.6B | 4,342% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 0.32 | 398% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.43 | 0.22 | 5,548% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.35 | 22.34 | 221% |
| Returns for 5 years | 100.49 | 32.94 | 305% |
| Returns for 10 years | 212.02 | 63.77 | 332% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement