Ad is loading...
FXAIX vs LCCCX
FXAIX vs LCCCX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs LCCCX
Columbia Contrarian Core C
Price$27.39
Change-$0.81 (-2.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.24B
FXAIX vs LCCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. LCCCX commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and LCCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 632B vs. LCCCX (14.2B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than LCCCX: FXAIX (1.23) vs LCCCX (0.00). FXAIX was incepted earlier than LCCCX: FXAIX (14 years) vs LCCCX (22 years). LCCCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). LCCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCCCX: FXAIX (0) vs LCCCX (2000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.38 vs. LCCCX (-1.05). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 109.80 vs. LCCCX (27.43).
| FXAIX | LCCCX | FXAIX / LCCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.74 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.74 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.670 | -1.742 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 632B | 14.2B | 4,451% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.38 | -1.05 | -1,271% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.86 | 11.33 | 396% |
| Returns for 5 years | 109.80 | 27.43 | 400% |
| Returns for 10 years | 206.52 | 42.24 | 489% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...