Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs LCCCX
FXAIX vs LCCCX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs LCCCX
Columbia Contrarian Core C
Price$29.35
Change+$0.29 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.57B
FXAIX vs LCCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. LCCCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and LCCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 634B vs. LCCCX (14.6B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than LCCCX: FXAIX (1.26) vs LCCCX (0.00). FXAIX was incepted earlier than LCCCX: FXAIX (14 years) vs LCCCX (23 years). LCCCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). LCCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCCCX: FXAIX (0) vs LCCCX (2000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.43 vs. LCCCX (-2.25). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 100.49 vs. LCCCX (20.53).
| FXAIX | LCCCX | FXAIX / LCCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.74 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.74 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.537 | 1.254 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 634B | 14.6B | 4,342% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.43 | -2.25 | -551% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.35 | 15.09 | 327% |
| Returns for 5 years | 100.49 | 20.53 | 489% |
| Returns for 10 years | 212.02 | 42.62 | 497% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement