Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs MIGCX
FXAIX vs MIGCX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs MIGCX
FXAIX vs MIGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. MIGCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Hold and MIGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 737B vs. MIGCX (11.4B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than MIGCX: FXAIX (1.11) vs MIGCX (0.00). FXAIX was incepted earlier than MIGCX: FXAIX (15 years) vs MIGCX (32 years). MIGCX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). MIGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIGCX: FXAIX (0) vs MIGCX (1000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.64 vs. MIGCX (4.66). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 100.37 vs. MIGCX (18.03).
| FXAIX | MIGCX | FXAIX / MIGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.57 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.57 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.677 | 11.692 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 737B | 11.4B | 6,465% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.64 | 4.66 | 314% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.65 | 38.03 | 199% |
| Returns for 5 years | 100.37 | 18.03 | 557% |
| Returns for 10 years | 251.30 | 22.03 | 1,141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement