Ad is loading...
FXAIX vs MNVAX
FXAIX vs MNVAX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs MNVAX
FXAIX vs MNVAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. MNVAX commentary
Mar 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Hold and MNVAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 632B vs. MNVAX (420M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than MNVAX: FXAIX (1.23) vs MNVAX (0.32). FXAIX was incepted earlier than MNVAX: FXAIX (14 years) vs MNVAX (11 years). MNVAX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). MNVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNVAX: FXAIX (0) vs MNVAX (1000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.18 vs. MNVAX (2.56). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 144.54 vs. MNVAX (56.01).
| FXAIX | MNVAX | FXAIX / MNVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.16 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.16 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.305 | -0.413 | 1,041% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 632B | 420M | 150,476% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 0.32 | 389% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.18 | 2.56 | 437% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.80 | 16.48 | 242% |
| Returns for 5 years | 144.54 | 56.01 | 258% |
| Returns for 10 years | 196.84 | 41.22 | 477% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...