Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs MNVAX
FXAIX vs MNVAX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs MNVAX
FXAIX vs MNVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. MNVAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Hold and MNVAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 723B vs. MNVAX (364M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than MNVAX: FXAIX (1.12) vs MNVAX (0.33). FXAIX was incepted earlier than MNVAX: FXAIX (14 years) vs MNVAX (12 years). MNVAX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). MNVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNVAX: FXAIX (0) vs MNVAX (1000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.93 vs. MNVAX (-8.56). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 104.83 vs. MNVAX (13.01).
| FXAIX | MNVAX | FXAIX / MNVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.16 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.16 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.832 | -2.411 | -574% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 723B | 364M | 198,626% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.33 | 342% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.93 | -8.56 | -175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 86.18 | 24.54 | 351% |
| Returns for 5 years | 104.83 | 13.01 | 806% |
| Returns for 10 years | 259.62 | 37.92 | 685% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers