Ad is loading...
FXAIX vs MNVAX
FXAIX vs MNVAX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs MNVAX
FXAIX vs MNVAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. MNVAX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and MNVAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 598B vs. MNVAX (391M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than MNVAX: FXAIX (1.30) vs MNVAX (0.33). FXAIX was incepted earlier than MNVAX: FXAIX (14 years) vs MNVAX (12 years). MNVAX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). MNVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNVAX: FXAIX (0) vs MNVAX (1000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.59 vs. MNVAX (-1.89). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 98.36 vs. MNVAX (33.06).
| FXAIX | MNVAX | FXAIX / MNVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.16 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.16 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.851 | -6.614 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 598B | 391M | 152,941% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.33 | 394% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.59 | -1.89 | -350% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.93 | 5.17 | 501% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.36 | 33.06 | 298% |
| Returns for 10 years | 175.23 | 28.84 | 608% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...