Ad is loading...
FXAIX vs MNVAX
FXAIX vs MNVAX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs MNVAX
FXAIX vs MNVAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. MNVAX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and MNVAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 594B vs. MNVAX (401M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than MNVAX: FXAIX (1.34) vs MNVAX (0.34). FXAIX was incepted earlier than MNVAX: FXAIX (14 years) vs MNVAX (12 years). MNVAX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). MNVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNVAX: FXAIX (0) vs MNVAX (1000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.00 vs. MNVAX (-1.25). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 107.31 vs. MNVAX (36.24).
| FXAIX | MNVAX | FXAIX / MNVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.16 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.16 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.872 | -2.790 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 594B | 401M | 148,130% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 0.34 | 395% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.00 | -1.25 | -798% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.66 | 18.50 | 258% |
| Returns for 5 years | 107.31 | 36.24 | 296% |
| Returns for 10 years | 192.42 | 35.51 | 542% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...