Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs NMIMX
FXAIX vs NMIMX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs NMIMX
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core Inst
Price$29.84
Change-$0.06 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets486.91M
FXAIX vs NMIMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. NMIMX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and NMIMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 696B vs. NMIMX (487M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than NMIMX: FXAIX (1.16) vs NMIMX (0.92). FXAIX was incepted earlier than NMIMX: FXAIX (14 years) vs NMIMX (29 years). NMIMX (0.96) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). NMIMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMIMX: FXAIX (0) vs NMIMX (2000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.95 vs. NMIMX (6.13). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 112.20 vs. NMIMX (27.88).
| FXAIX | NMIMX | FXAIX / NMIMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.58 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.96 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.505 | 8.499 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 696B | 487M | 142,916% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 0.92 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.95 | 6.13 | 309% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.48 | 44.68 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 112.20 | 27.88 | 402% |
| Returns for 10 years | 270.50 | 59.03 | 458% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement