Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs PBFDX
FXAIX vs PBFDX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs PBFDX
FXAIX vs PBFDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. PBFDX commentary
Sep 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and PBFDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 696B vs. PBFDX (321M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than PBFDX: FXAIX (1.16) vs PBFDX (0.25). FXAIX was incepted earlier than PBFDX: FXAIX (14 years) vs PBFDX (34 years). PBFDX (0.81) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). PBFDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than PBFDX: FXAIX (0) vs PBFDX (2000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.55 vs. PBFDX (8.16). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 101.58 vs. PBFDX (48.16).
| FXAIX | PBFDX | FXAIX / PBFDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.81 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.81 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.012 | 11.431 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 696B | 321M | 216,822% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 0.25 | 464% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.55 | 8.16 | 215% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.86 | 49.40 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 101.58 | 48.16 | 211% |
| Returns for 10 years | 266.28 | 167.49 | 159% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement