Ad is loading...
FXAIX vs REDWX
FXAIX vs REDWX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs REDWX
FXAIX vs REDWX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. REDWX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and REDWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 598B vs. REDWX (129M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than REDWX: FXAIX (1.30) vs REDWX (0.28). FXAIX was incepted earlier than REDWX: FXAIX (14 years) vs REDWX (9 years). REDWX (1.30) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). REDWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.55 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than REDWX: FXAIX (0) vs REDWX (10). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.42 vs. REDWX (-5.45). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 104.55 vs. REDWX (64.62).
| FXAIX | REDWX | FXAIX / REDWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.30 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.30 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.250 | -4.152 | 199% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 10 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 598B | 129M | 463,566% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.28 | 470% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.42 | -5.45 | -136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.00 | 6.10 | 509% |
| Returns for 5 years | 104.55 | 64.62 | 162% |
| Returns for 10 years | 178.96 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...