Ad is loading...
FXAIX vs RWEBX
FXAIX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs RWEBX
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$61.37
Change+$0.23 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets185.91B
FXAIX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. RWEBX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 594B vs. RWEBX (186B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: FXAIX (1.34) vs RWEBX (0.84). FXAIX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: FXAIX (14 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: FXAIX (0) vs RWEBX (250). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.00 vs. RWEBX (1.89). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 107.31 vs. RWEBX (51.24).
| FXAIX | RWEBX | FXAIX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.06 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.06 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.872 | 0.176 | -2,197% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 594B | 186B | 319% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 0.84 | 160% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.00 | 1.89 | 530% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.66 | 12.52 | 381% |
| Returns for 5 years | 107.31 | 51.24 | 209% |
| Returns for 10 years | 192.42 | 52.44 | 367% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...