Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs SPIAX
FXAIX vs SPIAX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs SPIAX
FXAIX vs SPIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. SPIAX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Hold and SPIAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 696B vs. SPIAX (4B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than SPIAX: FXAIX (1.16) vs SPIAX (0.70). FXAIX was incepted earlier than SPIAX: FXAIX (14 years) vs SPIAX (28 years). SPIAX (0.54) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). FXAIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 2.00 vs. SPIAX (1.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than SPIAX: FXAIX (0) vs SPIAX (1000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.13 vs. SPIAX (16.16). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 116.88 vs. SPIAX (105.58).
| FXAIX | SPIAX | FXAIX / SPIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.54 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.54 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.013 | 13.558 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 696B | 4B | 17,391% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 0.70 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.13 | 16.16 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 90.34 | 86.81 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 116.88 | 105.58 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 286.60 | 270.46 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement