Ad is loading...
FXAIX vs TICRX
FXAIX vs TICRX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs TICRX
Nuveen Large Cap Responsible Eq A
Price$22.40
Change+$0.60 (+2.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.35B
FXAIX vs TICRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. TICRX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and TICRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 594B vs. TICRX (6.35B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than TICRX: FXAIX (1.34) vs TICRX (1.23). FXAIX was incepted earlier than TICRX: FXAIX (14 years) vs TICRX (19 years). TICRX (0.49) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). TICRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than TICRX: FXAIX (0) vs TICRX (2500). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.80 vs. TICRX (-7.16). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 116.47 vs. TICRX (43.15).
| FXAIX | TICRX | FXAIX / TICRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.49 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.49 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.366 | -0.411 | 819% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 594B | 6.35B | 9,360% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 1.23 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.80 | -7.16 | -137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.15 | 9.32 | 506% |
| Returns for 5 years | 116.47 | 43.15 | 270% |
| Returns for 10 years | 191.42 | 48.47 | 395% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...