Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs WOGSX
FXAIX vs WOGSX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs WOGSX
White Oak Select Growth
Price$155.14
Change+$0.65 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets437.23M
FXAIX vs WOGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. WOGSX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and WOGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 682B vs. WOGSX (437M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than WOGSX: FXAIX (1.19) vs WOGSX (0.55). FXAIX was incepted earlier than WOGSX: FXAIX (14 years) vs WOGSX (33 years). WOGSX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). WOGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 6.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than WOGSX: FXAIX (0) vs WOGSX (2000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.40 vs. WOGSX (4.01). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 98.97 vs. WOGSX (41.14).
| FXAIX | WOGSX | FXAIX / WOGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.92 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.92 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.106 | 13.654 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 682B | 437M | 156,064% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 0.55 | 215% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.40 | 4.01 | 434% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.09 | 40.17 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.97 | 41.14 | 241% |
| Returns for 10 years | 260.49 | 168.01 | 155% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers