Ad is loading...
FXAIX vs WOGSX
FXAIX vs WOGSX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs WOGSX
White Oak Select Growth
Price$126.47
Change-$0.11 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets369.02M
FXAIX vs WOGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. WOGSX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and WOGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 598B vs. WOGSX (369M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than WOGSX: FXAIX (1.30) vs WOGSX (0.61). FXAIX was incepted earlier than WOGSX: FXAIX (14 years) vs WOGSX (33 years). WOGSX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). WOGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 6.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than WOGSX: FXAIX (0) vs WOGSX (2000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.45 vs. WOGSX (-7.50). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 98.09 vs. WOGSX (38.28).
| FXAIX | WOGSX | FXAIX / WOGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.93 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.93 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.974 | -6.879 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 598B | 369M | 162,060% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.61 | 215% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.45 | -7.50 | -86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.76 | 3.50 | 735% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.09 | 38.28 | 256% |
| Returns for 10 years | 174.86 | 119.06 | 147% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...