Ad is loading...
FXAIX vs WOGSX
FXAIX vs WOGSX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs WOGSX
White Oak Select Growth
Price$134.97
Change+$0.88 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets389.71M
FXAIX vs WOGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. WOGSX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and WOGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 594B vs. WOGSX (390M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than WOGSX: FXAIX (1.34) vs WOGSX (0.61). FXAIX was incepted earlier than WOGSX: FXAIX (14 years) vs WOGSX (33 years). WOGSX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). WOGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 6.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than WOGSX: FXAIX (0) vs WOGSX (2000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.00 vs. WOGSX (-7.16). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 107.31 vs. WOGSX (43.48).
| FXAIX | WOGSX | FXAIX / WOGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.92 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.92 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.872 | -1.354 | 286% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 594B | 390M | 152,308% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 0.61 | 218% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.00 | -7.16 | -140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.66 | 21.97 | 217% |
| Returns for 5 years | 107.31 | 43.48 | 247% |
| Returns for 10 years | 192.42 | 128.64 | 150% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...