Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXAIX vs WOGSX
FXAIX vs WOGSX Comparison
Open Charts FXAIX vs WOGSX
White Oak Select Growth
Price$158.72
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets449.83M
FXAIX vs WOGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXAIX vs. WOGSX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXAIX is a Buy and WOGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 696B vs. WOGSX (450M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than WOGSX: FXAIX (1.16) vs WOGSX (0.54). FXAIX was incepted earlier than WOGSX: FXAIX (14 years) vs WOGSX (33 years). WOGSX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). WOGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 6.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than WOGSX: FXAIX (0) vs WOGSX (2000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.77 vs. WOGSX (7.02). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 114.32 vs. WOGSX (54.95).
| FXAIX | WOGSX | FXAIX / WOGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.92 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.92 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.362 | 16.759 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 696B | 450M | 154,667% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 0.54 | 216% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.77 | 7.02 | 267% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.26 | 49.29 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 114.32 | 54.95 | 208% |
| Returns for 10 years | 270.04 | 178.78 | 151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement