Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXICX vs LMLCX
FXICX vs LMLCX Comparison
Open Charts FXICX vs LMLCX
PIMCO Fixed Income SHares C
Price$8.99
Change-$0.03 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.7B
Western Asset SMASh Series C
Price$8.83
Change-$0.09 (-1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets367.06M
FXICX vs LMLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXICX vs. LMLCX commentary
Jul 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXICX is a Hold and LMLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXICX has more cash in the bank: 1.7B vs. LMLCX (367M). LMLCX pays higher dividends than FXICX: LMLCX (6.50) vs FXICX (5.29). FXICX was incepted earlier than LMLCX: FXICX (25 years) vs LMLCX (19 years). FXICX (0.27) is less costly to investors than LMLCX (0.03). FXICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 571.00 vs. LMLCX (6.00). FXICX (0) and LMLCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXICX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.30 vs. LMLCX (1.45). LMLCX return over 5 years is better than : 20.94 vs. FXICX (3.46).
| FXICX | LMLCX | FXICX / LMLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.03 | 900% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.425 | 5.167 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.7B | 367M | 464% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.29 | 6.50 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.30 | 1.45 | 435% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.04 | 22.41 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.46 | 20.94 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.19 | 42.11 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement