Ad is loading...
FXICX vs LMLCX
FXICX vs LMLCX Comparison
Open Charts FXICX vs LMLCX
PIMCO Fixed Income SHares C
Price$8.90
Change-$0.04 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.66B
Western Asset SMASh Series C
Price$8.64
Change-$0.05 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets388.1M
FXICX vs LMLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXICX vs. LMLCX commentary
May 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXICX is a Hold and LMLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXICX has more cash in the bank: 1.66B vs. LMLCX (388M). LMLCX pays higher dividends than FXICX: LMLCX (6.61) vs FXICX (5.21). FXICX was incepted earlier than LMLCX: FXICX (25 years) vs LMLCX (18 years). FXICX (0.03) and LMLCX (0.03) have similar cost to investors . FXICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 571.00 vs. LMLCX (7.00). FXICX (0) and LMLCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXICX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.51 vs. LMLCX (2.70). LMLCX return over 5 years is better than : 26.47 vs. FXICX (5.64).
| FXICX | LMLCX | FXICX / LMLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.03 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.824 | 2.453 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.66B | 388M | 428% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.21 | 6.61 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.51 | 2.70 | 315% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.35 | 17.25 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.64 | 26.47 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.68 | 37.75 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...