Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXICX vs LMLCX
FXICX vs LMLCX Comparison
Open Charts FXICX vs LMLCX
PIMCO Fixed Income SHares C
Price$9.18
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.77B
Western Asset SMASh Series C
Price$9.32
Change+$0.06 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets371.4M
FXICX vs LMLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXICX vs. LMLCX commentary
Sep 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXICX is a Hold and LMLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXICX has more cash in the bank: 1.77B vs. LMLCX (371M). LMLCX pays higher dividends than FXICX: LMLCX (6.47) vs FXICX (5.41). FXICX was incepted earlier than LMLCX: FXICX (26 years) vs LMLCX (19 years). FXICX (0.27) is less costly to investors than LMLCX (0.03). FXICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 571.00 vs. LMLCX (6.00). FXICX (0) and LMLCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXICX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.95 vs. LMLCX (2.91). LMLCX return over 5 years is better than : 26.03 vs. FXICX (4.80).
| FXICX | LMLCX | FXICX / LMLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.03 | 900% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.527 | 11.392 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.77B | 371M | 476% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.41 | 6.47 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.95 | 2.91 | 170% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.90 | 26.56 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.80 | 26.03 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.16 | 51.63 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement