Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXICX vs LMLCX
FXICX vs LMLCX Comparison
Open Charts FXICX vs LMLCX
PIMCO Fixed Income SHares C
Price$9.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.73B
Western Asset SMASh Series C
Price$9.03
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets369.32M
FXICX vs LMLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXICX vs. LMLCX commentary
Aug 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXICX is a Hold and LMLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXICX has more cash in the bank: 1.73B vs. LMLCX (369M). LMLCX pays higher dividends than FXICX: LMLCX (6.53) vs FXICX (5.36). FXICX was incepted earlier than LMLCX: FXICX (25 years) vs LMLCX (19 years). FXICX (0.27) is less costly to investors than LMLCX (0.03). FXICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 571.00 vs. LMLCX (6.00). FXICX (0) and LMLCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXICX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.00 vs. LMLCX (2.96). LMLCX return over 5 years is better than : 20.70 vs. FXICX (3.90).
| FXICX | LMLCX | FXICX / LMLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.27 | 0.03 | 900% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.953 | 7.944 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.73B | 369M | 468% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.36 | 6.53 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.00 | 2.96 | 203% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.36 | 20.94 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.90 | 20.70 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.42 | 47.24 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement