Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXIMX vs LMLCX
FXIMX vs LMLCX Comparison
Open Charts FXIMX vs LMLCX
PIMCO Fixed Income SHares M
Price$8.99
Change+$0.02 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.77B
Western Asset SMASh Series C
Price$9.32
Change+$0.06 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets371.4M
FXIMX vs LMLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXIMX vs. LMLCX commentary
Sep 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXIMX is a Hold and LMLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXIMX has more cash in the bank: 1.77B vs. LMLCX (371M). LMLCX pays higher dividends than FXIMX: LMLCX (6.47) vs FXIMX (5.59). FXIMX was incepted earlier than LMLCX: FXIMX (26 years) vs LMLCX (19 years). FXIMX (0.14) is less costly to investors than LMLCX (0.03). FXIMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 576.00 vs. LMLCX (6.00). FXIMX (0) and LMLCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXIMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.78 vs. LMLCX (2.91). LMLCX return over 5 years is better than : 26.03 vs. FXIMX (6.15).
| FXIMX | LMLCX | FXIMX / LMLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.14 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.14 | 0.03 | 467% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.327 | 11.392 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.77B | 371M | 477% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.59 | 6.47 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.78 | 2.91 | 233% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.04 | 26.56 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.15 | 26.03 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.98 | 51.63 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement