Ad is loading...
FXIMX vs LMLCX
FXIMX vs LMLCX Comparison
Open Charts FXIMX vs LMLCX
PIMCO Fixed Income SHares M
Price$8.67
Change-$0.05 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.67B
Western Asset SMASh Series C
Price$8.64
Change-$0.05 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets388.1M
FXIMX vs LMLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXIMX vs. LMLCX commentary
May 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXIMX is a Hold and LMLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXIMX has more cash in the bank: 1.67B vs. LMLCX (388M). LMLCX pays higher dividends than FXIMX: LMLCX (6.61) vs FXIMX (5.74). FXIMX was incepted earlier than LMLCX: FXIMX (25 years) vs LMLCX (18 years). FXIMX (0.04) is less costly to investors than LMLCX (0.03). FXIMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 576.00 vs. LMLCX (7.00). FXIMX (0) and LMLCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXIMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.87 vs. LMLCX (2.70). LMLCX return over 5 years is better than : 26.47 vs. FXIMX (8.64).
| FXIMX | LMLCX | FXIMX / LMLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.03 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.311 | 2.453 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.67B | 388M | 431% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.74 | 6.61 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.87 | 2.70 | 365% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.94 | 17.25 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.64 | 26.47 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.47 | 37.75 | 99% |