Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXIMX vs LMLCX
FXIMX vs LMLCX Comparison
Open Charts FXIMX vs LMLCX
PIMCO Fixed Income SHares M
Price$9.12
Change+$0.02 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.8B
Western Asset SMASh Series C
Price$9.29
Change+$0.03 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets360.03M
FXIMX vs LMLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXIMX vs. LMLCX commentary
Oct 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXIMX is a Hold and LMLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXIMX has more cash in the bank: 1.8B vs. LMLCX (360M). LMLCX pays higher dividends than FXIMX: LMLCX (6.33) vs FXIMX (5.52). FXIMX was incepted earlier than LMLCX: FXIMX (26 years) vs LMLCX (19 years). FXIMX (0.14) is less costly to investors than LMLCX (0.03). FXIMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 576.00 vs. LMLCX (6.00). FXIMX (0) and LMLCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FXIMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.68 vs. LMLCX (6.31). LMLCX return over 5 years is better than : 27.03 vs. FXIMX (8.57).
| FXIMX | LMLCX | FXIMX / LMLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.14 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.14 | 0.03 | 467% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.370 | 12.467 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.8B | 360M | 501% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.52 | 6.33 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.68 | 6.31 | 153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.52 | 31.94 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.57 | 27.03 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.00 | 51.57 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement