FXLG
Price
$34.50
Change
-$0.10 (-0.29%)
Updated
May 27 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
PBFS
Price
$11.39
Change
-$0.09 (-0.78%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
254.84M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FXLG vs PBFS

Header iconFXLG vs PBFS Comparison
Open Charts FXLG vs PBFSBanner chart's image
F.S. Ban
Price$34.50
Change-$0.10 (-0.29%)
Volume$1.7K
CapitalizationN/A
Pioneer Ban
Price$11.39
Change-$0.09 (-0.78%)
Volume$9.36K
Capitalization254.84M
FXLG vs PBFS Comparison Chart
Loading...
PBFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FXLG vs. PBFS commentary
Jun 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXLG is a Hold and PBFS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 05, 2025
Stock price -- (FXLG: $34.50 vs. PBFS: $11.39)
Brand notoriety: FXLG and PBFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FXLG: 110% vs. PBFS: 74%
Market capitalization -- FXLG: $0 vs. PBFS: $254.84M
FXLG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. PBFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $254.84M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FXLG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePBFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FXLG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PBFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FXLG is a better buy in the long-term than PBFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PBFS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PBFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

FXLG (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PBFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

PBFS is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.37% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXLG YTD gains are higher at: 9.224 vs. PBFS (-1.128).
FXLGPBFSFXLG / PBFS
CapitalizationN/A255M-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.224-1.128-817%
P/E RatioN/A13.91-
RevenueN/A74.6M-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FXLG vs PBFS: Fundamental Ratings
FXLG
PBFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9363
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3068
SMR RATING
1..100
1816
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4957
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6851
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PBFS's Valuation (53) in the null industry is in the same range as FXLG (73). This means that PBFS’s stock grew similarly to FXLG’s over the last 12 months.

FXLG's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PBFS (68). This means that FXLG’s stock grew somewhat faster than PBFS’s over the last 12 months.

PBFS's SMR Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as FXLG (18). This means that PBFS’s stock grew similarly to FXLG’s over the last 12 months.

FXLG's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as PBFS (57). This means that FXLG’s stock grew similarly to PBFS’s over the last 12 months.

PBFS's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as FXLG (68). This means that PBFS’s stock grew similarly to FXLG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PBFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PBFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PIODX40.74N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer A
TNBRX19.59N/A
N/A
1290 SmartBeta Equity R
FEBRX14.49N/A
N/A
First Eagle Global Income Builder R6
MMLRX13.83N/A
N/A
MassMutual Select TRP Large Cap Blend I
LVFLX13.76N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R6

FXLG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FXLG and OTPBF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FXLG and OTPBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FXLG
1D Price
Change %
FXLG100%
N/A
OTPBF - FXLG
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BEOB - FXLG
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PBFS - FXLG
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.78%
FABP - FXLG
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRBK - FXLG
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.51%
More

PBFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PBFS has been loosely correlated with SMBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PBFS jumps, then SMBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBFS
1D Price
Change %
PBFS100%
-0.78%
SMBK - PBFS
41%
Loosely correlated
-2.02%
ORRF - PBFS
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.83%
TCBX - PBFS
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.25%
BCML - PBFS
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
CARE - PBFS
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.60%
More