Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXNCX vs MDXBX
FXNCX vs MDXBX Comparison
Open Charts FXNCX vs MDXBX
Franklin NC Tax-Free Income A1
Price$10.10
Change-$0.03 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets568.16M
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond
Price$9.72
Change-$0.02 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.27B
FXNCX vs MDXBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXNCX vs. MDXBX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXNCX is a Hold and MDXBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDXBX has more cash in the bank: 2.27B vs. FXNCX (568M). MDXBX pays higher dividends than FXNCX: MDXBX (3.44) vs FXNCX (2.95). FXNCX was incepted earlier than MDXBX: FXNCX (38 years) vs MDXBX (38 years). FXNCX (0.70) is less costly to investors than MDXBX (0.53). MDXBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.30 vs. FXNCX (10.28). FXNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDXBX: FXNCX (1000) vs MDXBX (2500). MDXBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.31 vs. FXNCX (-0.25). MDXBX return over 5 years is better than : 3.17 vs. FXNCX (-5.09).
| FXNCX | MDXBX | FXNCX / MDXBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.49 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.53 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.966 | -1.979 | 99% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 568M | 2.27B | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.95 | 3.44 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.25 | 0.31 | -81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.83 | 5.20 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.09 | 3.17 | -161% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.90 | 12.88 | -38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement