Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FXNCX vs TFBIX
FXNCX vs TFBIX Comparison
Open Charts FXNCX vs TFBIX
Franklin NC Tax-Free Income A1
Price$10.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets567.25M
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond I
Price$9.77
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.27B
FXNCX vs TFBIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FXNCX vs. TFBIX commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXNCX is a Hold and TFBIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFBIX has more cash in the bank: 2.27B vs. FXNCX (567M). TFBIX pays higher dividends than FXNCX: TFBIX (3.52) vs FXNCX (2.95). FXNCX was incepted earlier than TFBIX: FXNCX (38 years) vs TFBIX (8 years). FXNCX (0.70) is less costly to investors than TFBIX (0.41). TFBIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.30 vs. FXNCX (10.28). FXNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TFBIX: FXNCX (1000) vs TFBIX (500000). TFBIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.29 vs. FXNCX (-0.43). TFBIX return over 5 years is better than : 3.07 vs. FXNCX (-5.15).
| FXNCX | TFBIX | FXNCX / TFBIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.41 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.41 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.773 | -1.647 | 108% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 567M | 2.27B | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.95 | 3.52 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.43 | 0.29 | -148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.09 | 8.41 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.15 | 3.07 | -168% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.31 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement