FXP
Price
$25.32
Change
+$0.54 (+2.18%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Net Assets
7.43M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TZA
Price
$3.92
Change
+$0.08 (+2.08%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Net Assets
216.63M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FXP vs TZA

FXP vs TZA Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) vs. Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares (TZA)

Key Takeaways

  • FXP and TZA are both leveraged inverse ETFs designed for daily results rather than long-term holding, with FXP targeting -2x exposure and TZA targeting -3x exposure.
  • FXP provides inverse exposure to large-cap Chinese equities listed in Hong Kong via the FTSE China 50 Index, while TZA targets U.S. small-cap equities through the Russell 2000 Index.
  • Both funds rely on derivatives such as swaps and futures for exposure, resulting in low traditional equity holdings counts and daily reset mechanisms that amplify volatility.
  • Expense ratios are similar, with FXP at a net 0.95% and TZA at 0.99%, reflecting the higher costs associated with leveraged and inverse strategies.
  • Structural differences in leverage level, underlying market focus, and geographic exposure create distinct risk profiles, with TZA offering greater daily magnification but both carrying substantial decay risks over multiple periods.
  • These ETFs serve tactical, short-term trading purposes rather than core portfolio allocation, appealing to investors seeking to hedge or profit from declines in specific equity segments.

Introduction

ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares (TZA) represent specialized leveraged inverse strategies that do not compete directly but offer alternative ways to express bearish views on distinct equity markets. FXP focuses on large Chinese companies, while TZA targets U.S. small-capitalization stocks. Investors may compare them when evaluating tactical hedges or short-term positioning amid differing macroeconomic pressures on emerging versus domestic small-cap segments. Their daily-reset structures and use of derivatives make them tools for experienced traders rather than buy-and-hold vehicles.

ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) Overview

ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times the inverse (-2x) of the daily performance of the FTSE China 50 Index. The index measures the performance of the 50 largest and most liquid Chinese companies listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. The ETF employs a passive strategy using swap agreements and other derivatives to achieve its target exposure, resulting in a limited number of traditional holdings typically centered on index-related instruments. It carries a net expense ratio of 0.95%. Key distinguishing features include its geographic focus on Chinese large-cap equities and the moderate leverage level relative to some peers, with daily rebalancing to maintain the -2x objective.

Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares (TZA) Overview

Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares (TZA) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to three times the inverse (-3x) of the daily performance of the Russell 2000 Index. The index tracks approximately 2,000 small-capitalization U.S. companies. Like FXP, TZA uses a passive approach relying on swaps, futures, and short positions to deliver leveraged inverse exposure, maintaining a minimal number of holdings that are primarily derivative-based. It features a net expense ratio of 0.99%. Distinguishing characteristics include its higher leverage multiplier and exclusive focus on U.S. small-cap equities, with mandatory daily resets to align with the -3x target.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate in the leveraged and inverse ETF category, which serves investors seeking amplified daily exposure to equity market declines. Macroeconomic drivers such as interest rate expectations, trade policies, and economic growth differentials between China and the United States influence the underlying indices. Capital flows into or out of emerging markets and small-cap segments, along with sector-specific trends in technology, financials, and consumer areas, can affect performance dynamics. Regulatory developments in China and U.S. monetary policy shifts represent ongoing catalysts, while risks include currency fluctuations, geopolitical tensions, and the inherent compounding effects of daily leverage resets during volatile periods.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, FXP and TZA have exhibited performance tied to movements in their respective benchmarks, with TZA's higher leverage typically producing larger daily swings during U.S. small-cap volatility. Relative positioning highlights FXP's sensitivity to China-specific factors such as regulatory changes or export trends, contrasted with TZA's alignment to domestic economic indicators like employment data and interest rate paths. Both funds demonstrate elevated volatility due to leverage and daily rebalancing, often leading to divergence from simple multiples of benchmark returns over extended periods. Investors have used these ETFs for short-term tactical adjustments rather than sustained exposure amid shifting sector rotations between large international and small domestic equities.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to discover additional opportunities aligned with your strategy.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic preference to FXP due to its lower leverage multiplier, which may result in comparatively moderated daily decay and a more contained risk profile relative to TZA's -3x structure. FXP's focus on large-cap Chinese exposure also provides differentiation from U.S.-centric small-cap dynamics, potentially offering more consistent trend alignment in certain macro environments. Both remain high-risk vehicles suited primarily for short-term use, with final selection depending on an investor's specific market outlook and risk tolerance.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FXP vs. TZA commentary
Jul 06, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FXP is a Hold and TZA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TZA has more net assets: 217M vs. FXP (7.43M). FXP has a higher annual dividend yield than TZA: FXP (39.660) vs TZA (-46.772). FXP was incepted earlier than TZA: FXP (19 years) vs TZA (18 years). FXP (0.95) and TZA (0.99) have comparable expense ratios .
FXPTZAFXP / TZA
Gain YTD39.660-46.772-85%
Net Assets7.43M217M3%
Total Expense Ratio0.950.9996%
TurnoverN/A0.00-
Yield2.555.1549%
Fund Existence19 years18 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FXPTZA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FXP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TZA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LYFIX19.030.49
+2.64%
AlphaCentric Life Sciences & Hlthcare I
CSMIX48.920.03
+0.06%
Columbia Small Cap Value Discv A
KMKNX83.59-0.10
-0.12%
Kinetics Market Opportunities No Load
VTSIX119.94-0.85
-0.70%
Vanguard Tax-Managed Small Cap I
DBMYX24.96-0.45
-1.77%
BNY Mellon Sm/Md Cp Gr Y