FYBR
Price
$36.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
6.02B
28 days until earnings call
LMGHF
Price
$2.10
Change
+$0.30 (+16.67%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
398.42M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FYBR vs LMGHF

Header iconFYBR vs LMGHF Comparison
Open Charts FYBR vs LMGHFBanner chart's image
Frontier Communications Parent
Price$36.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$768.36K
Capitalization6.02B
VICTORY PARTN VIII NORWAY HLDG AS
Price$2.10
Change+$0.30 (+16.67%)
Volume$11.5K
Capitalization398.42M
FYBR vs LMGHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FYBR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FYBR vs. LMGHF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FYBR is a Buy and LMGHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FYBR: $36.50 vs. LMGHF: $2.10)
Brand notoriety: FYBR and LMGHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wireless Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FYBR: 25% vs. LMGHF: 100%
Market capitalization -- FYBR: $6.02B vs. LMGHF: $398.42M
FYBR [@Wireless Telecommunications] is valued at $6.02B. LMGHF’s [@Wireless Telecommunications] market capitalization is $398.42M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry ranges from $12.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry is $17.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FYBR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLMGHF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FYBR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LMGHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FYBR is a better buy in the long-term than LMGHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FYBR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FYBR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

FYBR (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а +0.50% price change this week, while LMGHF (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

FYBR is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (+1.68% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FYBR($6.02B) has a higher market cap than LMGHF($398M). FYBR YTD gains are higher at: 5.187 vs. LMGHF (0.000). FYBR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.19B vs. LMGHF (582M). FYBR has more cash in the bank: 2.2B vs. LMGHF (964M). LMGHF has less debt than FYBR: LMGHF (4.25B) vs FYBR (11.3B). FYBR (5.68B) and LMGHF (5.46B) have equivalent revenues.
FYBRLMGHFFYBR / LMGHF
Capitalization6.02B398M1,513%
EBITDA2.19B582M375%
Gain YTD5.1870.000-
P/E Ratio199.42N/A-
Revenue5.68B5.46B104%
Total Cash2.2B964M228%
Total Debt11.3B4.25B266%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FYBRLMGHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
4%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
4%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
68%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FYBR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AFMCX14.200.16
+1.14%
Acuitas US Microcap Institutional
PBQQX25.260.24
+0.96%
PGIM Jennison Blend R6
PACLX36.14N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Adv
SCRLX75.96N/A
N/A
Touchstone Large Cap Focused Instl
EXOSX36.51N/A
N/A
Manning & Napier Overseas Series I

FYBR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FYBR has been loosely correlated with S. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FYBR jumps, then S could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FYBR
1D Price
Change %
FYBR100%
N/A
S - FYBR
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.77%
CHTR - FYBR
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.14%
CMCSA - FYBR
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
ASTS - FYBR
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
USM - FYBR
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.66%
More

LMGHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LMGHF and KDDIF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LMGHF and KDDIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LMGHF
1D Price
Change %
LMGHF100%
N/A
KDDIF - LMGHF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FYBR - LMGHF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MYTEF - LMGHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRTAY - LMGHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HKBNF - LMGHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More