Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZABX vs RERAX
FZABX vs RERAX Comparison
Open Charts FZABX vs RERAX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z
Price$30.61
Change+$0.08 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.52B
American Funds EUPAC R1
Price$58.21
Change+$0.34 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.22B
FZABX vs RERAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZABX vs. RERAX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZABX is a Buy and RERAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERAX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. FZABX (1.52B). FZABX pays higher dividends than RERAX: FZABX (1.67) vs RERAX (0.24). FZABX was incepted earlier than RERAX: FZABX (12 years) vs RERAX (23 years). RERAX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FZABX (0.73). RERAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FZABX (33.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERAX: FZABX (0) vs RERAX (250). FZABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.40 vs. RERAX (7.03). FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 23.15 vs. RERAX (8.34).
| FZABX | RERAX | FZABX / RERAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.57 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.57 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.940 | 15.427 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.52B | 135B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 0.24 | 705% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.40 | 7.03 | 162% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.52 | 21.84 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.15 | 8.34 | 278% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.30 | 25.54 | 205% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement