Ad is loading...
FZABX vs RERAX
FZABX vs RERAX Comparison
Open Charts FZABX vs RERAX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z
Price$27.05
Change-$0.29 (-1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.4B
American Funds Europacific Growth R1
Price$53.73
Change-$0.50 (-0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets131.04B
FZABX vs RERAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZABX vs. RERAX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZABX is a Buy and RERAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERAX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. FZABX (1.4B). FZABX pays higher dividends than RERAX: FZABX (1.45) vs RERAX (0.91). FZABX was incepted earlier than RERAX: FZABX (12 years) vs RERAX (23 years). RERAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. FZABX (23.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERAX: FZABX (0) vs RERAX (250). FZABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.14 vs. RERAX (0.55). FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 14.31 vs. RERAX (4.19).
| FZABX | RERAX | FZABX / RERAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.875 | 6.544 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.4B | 131B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 0.91 | 159% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.14 | 0.55 | 748% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.32 | -0.33 | -1,939% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.31 | 4.19 | 342% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.23 | 15.23 | 251% |