Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZABX vs RERAX
FZABX vs RERAX Comparison
Open Charts FZABX vs RERAX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z
Price$31.22
Change+$0.12 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
American Funds EUPAC R1
Price$60.72
Change+$0.28 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.17B
FZABX vs RERAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZABX vs. RERAX commentary
Oct 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZABX is a StrongBuy and RERAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERAX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. FZABX (1.6B). FZABX pays higher dividends than RERAX: FZABX (1.59) vs RERAX (0.22). FZABX was incepted earlier than RERAX: FZABX (12 years) vs RERAX (23 years). RERAX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FZABX (0.73). RERAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FZABX (33.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERAX: FZABX (0) vs RERAX (250). FZABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.81 vs. RERAX (8.58). FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 23.99 vs. RERAX (12.42).
| FZABX | RERAX | FZABX / RERAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.57 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.57 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.876 | 20.405 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 137B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 0.22 | 720% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.81 | 8.58 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.17 | 46.63 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.99 | 12.42 | 193% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.58 | 37.64 | 172% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement