Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZABX vs RERAX
FZABX vs RERAX Comparison
Open Charts FZABX vs RERAX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z
Price$30.59
Change-$0.45 (-1.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.63B
American Funds EUPAC R1
Price$59.61
Change-$0.82 (-1.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.2B
FZABX vs RERAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZABX vs. RERAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZABX is a Hold and RERAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERAX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. FZABX (1.63B). FZABX pays higher dividends than RERAX: FZABX (1.56) vs RERAX (0.22). FZABX was incepted earlier than RERAX: FZABX (12 years) vs RERAX (23 years). RERAX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FZABX (0.73). FZABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RERAX (35.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERAX: FZABX (0) vs RERAX (250). FZABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.57 vs. RERAX (12.09). FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 17.30 vs. RERAX (0.50).
| FZABX | RERAX | FZABX / RERAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.57 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.57 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.639 | 18.203 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.63B | 134B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 0.22 | 725% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.57 | 12.09 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.84 | 28.84 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.30 | 0.50 | 3,436% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.80 | 32.26 | 188% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement