Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZABX vs RERAX
FZABX vs RERAX Comparison
Open Charts FZABX vs RERAX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z
Price$31.44
Change+$0.16 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
American Funds EUPAC R1
Price$61.34
Change+$0.20 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.04B
FZABX vs RERAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZABX vs. RERAX commentary
Oct 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZABX is a Hold and RERAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERAX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. FZABX (1.6B). FZABX pays higher dividends than RERAX: FZABX (1.59) vs RERAX (0.22). FZABX was incepted earlier than RERAX: FZABX (12 years) vs RERAX (23 years). RERAX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FZABX (0.73). FZABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RERAX (35.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERAX: FZABX (0) vs RERAX (250). FZABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.90 vs. RERAX (11.95). FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 23.85 vs. RERAX (10.19).
| FZABX | RERAX | FZABX / RERAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.57 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.57 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.220 | 21.634 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 138B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 0.22 | 720% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.90 | 11.95 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.25 | 44.75 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.85 | 10.19 | 234% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.47 | 35.37 | 177% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement