Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZABX vs RERAX
FZABX vs RERAX Comparison
Open Charts FZABX vs RERAX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z
Price$30.32
Change-$0.05 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.58B
American Funds EUPAC R1
Price$57.38
Change-$0.31 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.06B
FZABX vs RERAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZABX vs. RERAX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZABX is a Hold and RERAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERAX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. FZABX (1.58B). FZABX pays higher dividends than RERAX: FZABX (1.63) vs RERAX (0.23). FZABX was incepted earlier than RERAX: FZABX (12 years) vs RERAX (23 years). RERAX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FZABX (0.73). RERAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FZABX (33.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERAX: FZABX (0) vs RERAX (250). FZABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.89 vs. RERAX (8.57). FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 25.28 vs. RERAX (10.28).
| FZABX | RERAX | FZABX / RERAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.57 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.57 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.795 | 13.781 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.58B | 135B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 0.23 | 699% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.89 | 8.57 | 162% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.73 | 27.07 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.28 | 10.28 | 246% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.83 | 22.21 | 220% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement