Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZABX vs RERAX
FZABX vs RERAX Comparison
Open Charts FZABX vs RERAX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z
Price$29.41
Change-$0.38 (-1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.52B
American Funds EUPAC R1
Price$55.10
Change-$0.75 (-1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.41B
FZABX vs RERAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZABX vs. RERAX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZABX is a StrongBuy and RERAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERAX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. FZABX (1.52B). FZABX pays higher dividends than RERAX: FZABX (1.69) vs RERAX (0.42). FZABX was incepted earlier than RERAX: FZABX (12 years) vs RERAX (23 years). RERAX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FZABX (0.73). FZABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. RERAX (30.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERAX: FZABX (0) vs RERAX (250). FZABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.11 vs. RERAX (2.40). FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 33.24 vs. RERAX (14.27).
| FZABX | RERAX | FZABX / RERAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.57 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.57 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.701 | 9.260 | 191% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.52B | 134B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 0.42 | 401% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.11 | 2.40 | 421% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.88 | 22.99 | 182% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.24 | 14.27 | 233% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.81 | 15.70 | 305% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement