Ad is loading...
FZABX vs RERAX
FZABX vs RERAX Comparison
Open Charts FZABX vs RERAX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z
Price$26.49
Change+$0.22 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.39B
American Funds Europacific Growth R1
Price$50.31
Change+$0.22 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets119.82B
FZABX vs RERAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZABX vs. RERAX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZABX is a Buy and RERAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERAX has more cash in the bank: 120B vs. FZABX (1.39B). FZABX pays higher dividends than RERAX: FZABX (1.84) vs RERAX (0.46). FZABX was incepted earlier than RERAX: FZABX (12 years) vs RERAX (23 years). RERAX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FZABX (0.73). FZABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. RERAX (30.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERAX: FZABX (0) vs RERAX (250). FZABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.37 vs. RERAX (-4.91). FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 30.40 vs. RERAX (16.85).
| FZABX | RERAX | FZABX / RERAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.57 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.57 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.793 | -0.238 | -1,594% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 120B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.84 | 0.46 | 405% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.37 | -4.91 | -48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.72 | -1.39 | -556% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.40 | 16.85 | 180% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.27 | 4.72 | 663% |