Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZABX vs RERGX
FZABX vs RERGX Comparison
Open Charts FZABX vs RERGX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z
Price$29.41
Change-$0.38 (-1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.52B
American Funds EUPAC R6
Price$59.10
Change-$0.80 (-1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.41B
FZABX vs RERGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZABX vs. RERGX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZABX is a StrongBuy and RERGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERGX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. FZABX (1.52B). FZABX pays higher dividends than RERGX: FZABX (1.69) vs RERGX (1.37). FZABX was incepted earlier than RERGX: FZABX (12 years) vs RERGX (16 years). FZABX (0.73) is less costly to investors than RERGX (0.47). FZABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. RERGX (30.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERGX: FZABX (0) vs RERGX (250). FZABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.11 vs. RERGX (3.95). FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 33.24 vs. RERGX (20.61).
| FZABX | RERGX | FZABX / RERGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.47 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.47 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.701 | 10.015 | 177% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.52B | 134B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 1.37 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.11 | 3.95 | 256% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.88 | 26.91 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.24 | 20.61 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.81 | 23.65 | 202% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement