Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZABX vs RERGX
FZABX vs RERGX Comparison
Open Charts FZABX vs RERGX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z
Price$29.93
Change+$0.23 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.55B
American Funds EUPAC R6
Price$62.02
Change+$0.35 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.86B
FZABX vs RERGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZABX vs. RERGX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZABX is a Hold and RERGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERGX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. FZABX (1.55B). FZABX pays higher dividends than RERGX: FZABX (1.64) vs RERGX (0.93). FZABX was incepted earlier than RERGX: FZABX (12 years) vs RERGX (16 years). FZABX (0.73) is less costly to investors than RERGX (0.47). RERGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FZABX (33.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERGX: FZABX (0) vs RERGX (250). FZABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.16 vs. RERGX (8.50). FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 20.60 vs. RERGX (12.67).
| FZABX | RERGX | FZABX / RERGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.47 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.47 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.254 | 15.450 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.55B | 133B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.64 | 0.93 | 177% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.16 | 8.50 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.12 | 35.83 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.60 | 12.67 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.26 | 41.46 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement