Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZABX vs RERGX
FZABX vs RERGX Comparison
Open Charts FZABX vs RERGX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z
Price$30.32
Change-$0.05 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.58B
American Funds EUPAC R6
Price$61.62
Change-$0.33 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.06B
FZABX vs RERGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZABX vs. RERGX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZABX is a Hold and RERGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERGX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. FZABX (1.58B). FZABX pays higher dividends than RERGX: FZABX (1.63) vs RERGX (0.95). FZABX was incepted earlier than RERGX: FZABX (12 years) vs RERGX (16 years). FZABX (0.73) is less costly to investors than RERGX (0.47). RERGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FZABX (33.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERGX: FZABX (0) vs RERGX (250). FZABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.89 vs. RERGX (10.20). FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 25.28 vs. RERGX (16.38).
| FZABX | RERGX | FZABX / RERGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.47 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.47 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.795 | 14.706 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.58B | 135B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 0.95 | 173% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.89 | 10.20 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.73 | 31.12 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.28 | 16.38 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.83 | 30.59 | 160% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement