Ad is loading...
FZAFX vs VIGRX
FZAFX vs VIGRX Comparison
Open Charts FZAFX vs VIGRX
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Z
Price$22.49
Change+$0.17 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.77B
Vanguard Growth Index Investor
Price$199.65
Change+$1.55 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.26B
FZAFX vs VIGRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZAFX vs. VIGRX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZAFX is a Buy and VIGRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIGRX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. FZAFX (10.8B). VIGRX pays higher dividends than FZAFX: VIGRX (0.38) vs FZAFX (0.00). FZAFX was incepted earlier than VIGRX: FZAFX (12 years) vs VIGRX (33 years). FZAFX (0.55) is less costly to investors than VIGRX (0.17). FZAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. VIGRX (11.00). FZAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIGRX: FZAFX (0) vs VIGRX (3000). VIGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.26 vs. FZAFX (-3.33). VIGRX return over 5 years is better than : 107.92 vs. FZAFX (55.76).
| FZAFX | VIGRX | FZAFX / VIGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.17 | 324% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.17 | 324% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.061 | -6.243 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 269B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.38 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.33 | 12.26 | -27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.08 | 64.12 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.76 | 107.92 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.78 | 255.60 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers