Ad is loading...
FZAFX vs VIGRX
FZAFX vs VIGRX Comparison
Open Charts FZAFX vs VIGRX
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Z
Price$20.55
Change+$0.07 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.76B
Vanguard Growth Index Investor
Price$181.21
Change+$0.19 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.76B
FZAFX vs VIGRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZAFX vs. VIGRX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZAFX is a Buy and VIGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIGRX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. FZAFX (10.8B). VIGRX pays higher dividends than FZAFX: VIGRX (0.39) vs FZAFX (0.00). FZAFX was incepted earlier than VIGRX: FZAFX (12 years) vs VIGRX (32 years). FZAFX (0.55) is less costly to investors than VIGRX (0.17). FZAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. VIGRX (5.00). FZAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIGRX: FZAFX (0) vs VIGRX (3000). VIGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.27 vs. FZAFX (-8.61). VIGRX return over 5 years is better than : 105.37 vs. FZAFX (51.82).
| FZAFX | VIGRX | FZAFX / VIGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.17 | 324% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.17 | 324% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.805 | -11.676 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 261B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.39 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.61 | 8.27 | -104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.41 | 34.14 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.82 | 105.37 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.25 | 237.17 | 40% |