Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZAFX vs VIGRX
FZAFX vs VIGRX Comparison
Open Charts FZAFX vs VIGRX
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Z
Price$24.86
Change+$0.20 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.63B
Vanguard Growth Index Investor
Price$224.62
Change+$1.41 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets293.94B
FZAFX vs VIGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZAFX vs. VIGRX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZAFX is a Buy and VIGRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIGRX has more cash in the bank: 294B vs. FZAFX (11.6B). VIGRX pays higher dividends than FZAFX: VIGRX (0.35) vs FZAFX (0.00). FZAFX was incepted earlier than VIGRX: FZAFX (12 years) vs VIGRX (33 years). FZAFX (0.55) is less costly to investors than VIGRX (0.17). FZAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. VIGRX (11.00). FZAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIGRX: FZAFX (0) vs VIGRX (3000). VIGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.93 vs. FZAFX (-0.08). VIGRX return over 5 years is better than : 121.39 vs. FZAFX (60.49).
| FZAFX | VIGRX | FZAFX / VIGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.17 | 324% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.17 | 324% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.630 | 5.642 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.6B | 294B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.35 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.08 | 14.93 | -1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.18 | 92.43 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.49 | 121.39 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.39 | 306.51 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement