Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZAMX vs VIMSX
FZAMX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts FZAMX vs VIMSX
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Z
Price$23.89
Change-$0.06 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.52B
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$77.66
Change-$0.04 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets196.76B
FZAMX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZAMX vs. VIMSX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZAMX is a StrongBuy and VIMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 197B vs. FZAMX (1.52B). VIMSX pays higher dividends than FZAMX: VIMSX (1.37) vs FZAMX (0.53). FZAMX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: FZAMX (12 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). FZAMX (0.58) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). FZAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. VIMSX (16.00). FZAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: FZAMX (0) vs VIMSX (3000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.27 vs. FZAMX (3.80). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 62.14 vs. FZAMX (25.21).
| FZAMX | VIMSX | FZAMX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.17 | 341% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.17 | 341% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.481 | 7.874 | -19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.52B | 197B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 1.37 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.80 | 18.27 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.32 | 31.68 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.21 | 62.14 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.93 | 128.03 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement