Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZAMX vs VIMSX
FZAMX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts FZAMX vs VIMSX
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Z
Price$24.94
Change-$0.26 (-1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.57B
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$80.20
Change-$0.48 (-0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets201.28B
FZAMX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZAMX vs. VIMSX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZAMX is a Hold and VIMSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 201B vs. FZAMX (1.57B). VIMSX pays higher dividends than FZAMX: VIMSX (1.36) vs FZAMX (0.51). FZAMX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: FZAMX (12 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). FZAMX (0.58) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). FZAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. VIMSX (16.00). FZAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: FZAMX (0) vs VIMSX (3000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.10 vs. FZAMX (-0.08). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 61.47 vs. FZAMX (24.41).
| FZAMX | VIMSX | FZAMX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.17 | 341% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.17 | 341% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.661 | 12.042 | 30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.57B | 201B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 1.36 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.08 | 13.10 | -1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.52 | 54.69 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.41 | 61.47 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.43 | 145.68 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement