Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FZAPX vs RGAGX
FZAPX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FZAPX vs RGAGX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Sel Z
Price$85.68
Change+$0.75 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.51B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$84.25
Change+$0.26 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.99B
FZAPX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FZAPX vs. RGAGX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FZAPX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. FZAPX (7.51B). FZAPX pays higher dividends than RGAGX: FZAPX (0.81) vs RGAGX (0.60). FZAPX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FZAPX (12 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). FZAPX (0.36) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FZAPX (3.00). FZAPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FZAPX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.99 vs. FZAPX (15.48). FZAPX return over 5 years is better than : 71.36 vs. RGAGX (44.78).
| FZAPX | RGAGX | FZAPX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.30 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.30 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.108 | 13.011 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.51B | 325B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 0.60 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.48 | 18.99 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.18 | 48.54 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.36 | 44.78 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 142.80 | 88.37 | 162% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement