Ad is loading...
GAFFX vs KCGSX
GAFFX vs KCGSX Comparison
Open Charts GAFFX vs KCGSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F3
Price$66.28
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.27B
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Growth S
Price$18.02
Change-$0.02 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets205.97M
GAFFX vs KCGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GAFFX vs. KCGSX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAFFX is a Buy and KCGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GAFFX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. KCGSX (206M). GAFFX pays higher dividends than KCGSX: GAFFX (0.72) vs KCGSX (0.01). GAFFX was incepted earlier than KCGSX: GAFFX (8 years) vs KCGSX (10 years). KCGSX (1.00) is less costly to investors than GAFFX (0.30). KCGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. GAFFX (25.00). KCGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GAFFX: KCGSX (0) vs GAFFX (1000000). KCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.98 vs. GAFFX (-2.52). KCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 44.63 vs. GAFFX (38.87).
| GAFFX | KCGSX | GAFFX / KCGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.00 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.00 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.998 | -13.240 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 261B | 206M | 126,699% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 0.01 | 5,926% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.52 | 2.98 | -84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.01 | 24.91 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.87 | 44.63 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |