Ad is loading...
GAFFX vs RDLAX
GAFFX vs RDLAX Comparison
Open Charts GAFFX vs RDLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F3
Price$72.65
Change-$0.09 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.87B
Columbia Disciplined Growth A
Price$9.98
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.4M
GAFFX vs RDLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GAFFX vs. RDLAX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAFFX is a StrongBuy and RDLAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GAFFX has more cash in the bank: 286B vs. RDLAX (261M). GAFFX pays higher dividends than RDLAX: GAFFX (0.70) vs RDLAX (0.00). GAFFX was incepted earlier than RDLAX: GAFFX (8 years) vs RDLAX (18 years). RDLAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than GAFFX (0.30). RDLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. GAFFX (25.00). RDLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GAFFX: RDLAX (2000) vs GAFFX (1000000). GAFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.51 vs. RDLAX (-3.48). GAFFX return over 5 years is better than : 46.03 vs. RDLAX (11.52).
| GAFFX | RDLAX | GAFFX / RDLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.06 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.17 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.444 | -7.514 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 286B | 261M | 109,579% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.51 | -3.48 | -101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.08 | 17.16 | 199% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.03 | 11.52 | 400% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 8.40 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...