Ad is loading...
GAFFX vs RDLAX
GAFFX vs RDLAX Comparison
Open Charts GAFFX vs RDLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F3
Price$67.24
Change+$1.05 (+1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.89B
Columbia Disciplined Growth A
Price$9.27
Change+$0.17 (+1.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.26M
GAFFX vs RDLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GAFFX vs. RDLAX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAFFX is a Buy and RDLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GAFFX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. RDLAX (252M). GAFFX pays higher dividends than RDLAX: GAFFX (0.72) vs RDLAX (0.00). GAFFX was incepted earlier than RDLAX: GAFFX (8 years) vs RDLAX (18 years). RDLAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than GAFFX (0.30). RDLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. GAFFX (25.00). RDLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GAFFX: RDLAX (2000) vs GAFFX (1000000). GAFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.91 vs. RDLAX (-12.42). GAFFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.10 vs. RDLAX (10.57).
| GAFFX | RDLAX | GAFFX / RDLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.06 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.17 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.709 | -15.584 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 261B | 252M | 103,571% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.91 | -12.42 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.67 | -3.29 | -233% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.10 | 10.57 | 464% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -0.84 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...