Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GAFFX vs RDLAX
GAFFX vs RDLAX Comparison
Open Charts GAFFX vs RDLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F3
Price$86.02
Change-$0.60 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Columbia Disciplined Growth A
Price$12.30
Change-$0.13 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets309.04M
GAFFX vs RDLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GAFFX vs. RDLAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAFFX is a Hold and RDLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GAFFX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. RDLAX (309M). GAFFX pays higher dividends than RDLAX: GAFFX (0.56) vs RDLAX (0.00). GAFFX was incepted earlier than RDLAX: GAFFX (9 years) vs RDLAX (19 years). RDLAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than GAFFX (0.30). RDLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. GAFFX (25.00). RDLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GAFFX: RDLAX (2000) vs GAFFX (1000000). GAFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.56 vs. RDLAX (5.85). GAFFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.72 vs. RDLAX (11.11).
| GAFFX | RDLAX | GAFFX / RDLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.06 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.17 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.510 | 14.100 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 309M | 105,825% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.56 | 5.85 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.17 | 49.82 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.72 | 11.11 | 312% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 30.22 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers