Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GAFFX vs RDLAX
GAFFX vs RDLAX Comparison
Open Charts GAFFX vs RDLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F3
Price$78.34
Change-$0.95 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
Columbia Disciplined Growth A
Price$10.67
Change-$0.17 (-1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets274.2M
GAFFX vs RDLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GAFFX vs. RDLAX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAFFX is a StrongBuy and RDLAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GAFFX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. RDLAX (274M). GAFFX pays higher dividends than RDLAX: GAFFX (0.65) vs RDLAX (0.00). GAFFX was incepted earlier than RDLAX: GAFFX (8 years) vs RDLAX (18 years). RDLAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than GAFFX (0.30). RDLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. GAFFX (25.00). RDLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GAFFX: RDLAX (2000) vs GAFFX (1000000). GAFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.65 vs. RDLAX (-3.70). GAFFX return over 5 years is better than : 51.03 vs. RDLAX (14.00).
| GAFFX | RDLAX | GAFFX / RDLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.06 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.17 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.197 | -1.020 | -509% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306B | 274M | 111,679% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.65 | -3.70 | -207% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.61 | 35.23 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.03 | 14.00 | 365% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 17.15 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement