Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GAFFX vs RDLCX
GAFFX vs RDLCX Comparison
Open Charts GAFFX vs RDLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F3
Price$83.35
Change+$0.34 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.72B
Columbia Disciplined Growth C
Price$9.64
Change+$0.03 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets287.89M
GAFFX vs RDLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GAFFX vs. RDLCX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAFFX is a StrongBuy and RDLCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GAFFX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. RDLCX (288M). GAFFX pays higher dividends than RDLCX: GAFFX (0.61) vs RDLCX (0.00). GAFFX was incepted earlier than RDLCX: GAFFX (8 years) vs RDLCX (18 years). RDLCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than GAFFX (0.30). RDLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. GAFFX (25.00). RDLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GAFFX: RDLCX (2000) vs GAFFX (1000000). GAFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.66 vs. RDLCX (-3.51). GAFFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.57 vs. RDLCX (2.23).
| GAFFX | RDLCX | GAFFX / RDLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.81 | 17% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.92 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.924 | 4.343 | 275% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323B | 288M | 112,153% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.66 | -3.51 | -275% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.17 | 29.17 | 206% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.57 | 2.23 | 2,129% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 4.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers