Ad is loading...
GAFFX vs RDLCX
GAFFX vs RDLCX Comparison
Open Charts GAFFX vs RDLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F3
Price$72.74
Change+$0.54 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.8B
Columbia Disciplined Growth C
Price$8.49
Change+$0.07 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets259.38M
GAFFX vs RDLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GAFFX vs. RDLCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAFFX is a StrongBuy and RDLCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GAFFX has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. RDLCX (259M). GAFFX pays higher dividends than RDLCX: GAFFX (0.70) vs RDLCX (0.00). GAFFX was incepted earlier than RDLCX: GAFFX (8 years) vs RDLCX (18 years). RDLCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than GAFFX (0.30). RDLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. GAFFX (25.00). RDLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GAFFX: RDLCX (2000) vs GAFFX (1000000). GAFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.02 vs. RDLCX (-5.50). GAFFX return over 5 years is better than : 46.21 vs. RDLCX (0.48).
| GAFFX | RDLCX | GAFFX / RDLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.81 | 17% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.92 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.323 | -8.578 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 284B | 259M | 109,653% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.02 | -5.50 | -73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.20 | 11.23 | 313% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.21 | 0.48 | 9,682% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -7.06 | - |