Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GAFFX vs RDLCX
GAFFX vs RDLCX Comparison
Open Charts GAFFX vs RDLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F3
Price$81.24
Change+$0.84 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets313.68B
Columbia Disciplined Growth C
Price$9.41
Change+$0.08 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets280.98M
GAFFX vs RDLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GAFFX vs. RDLCX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAFFX is a StrongBuy and RDLCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GAFFX has more cash in the bank: 314B vs. RDLCX (281M). GAFFX pays higher dividends than RDLCX: GAFFX (0.65) vs RDLCX (0.00). GAFFX was incepted earlier than RDLCX: GAFFX (8 years) vs RDLCX (18 years). RDLCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than GAFFX (0.30). RDLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. GAFFX (25.00). RDLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GAFFX: RDLCX (2000) vs GAFFX (1000000). GAFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.40 vs. RDLCX (-3.22). GAFFX return over 5 years is better than : 55.36 vs. RDLCX (5.30).
| GAFFX | RDLCX | GAFFX / RDLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.81 | 17% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.92 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.091 | 1.303 | 698% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 314B | 281M | 111,744% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.40 | -3.22 | -324% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.07 | 25.57 | 208% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.36 | 5.30 | 1,044% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 5.78 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement