Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GAHPX vs RNWBX
GAHPX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GAHPX vs RNWBX
Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Eq P
Price$26.64
Change+$0.16 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.85B
American Funds New World R2
Price$85.27
Change+$0.52 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.56B
GAHPX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GAHPX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAHPX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.6B vs. GAHPX (2.85B). GAHPX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: GAHPX (0.96) vs RNWBX (0.13). GAHPX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GAHPX (7 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than GAHPX (1.12). RNWBX (37.00) and GAHPX (36.00) have comparable annual turnover. GAHPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: GAHPX (0) vs RNWBX (250). GAHPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.96 vs. RNWBX (10.50). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 27.64 vs. GAHPX (20.09).
| GAHPX | RNWBX | GAHPX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.67 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.67 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.630 | 15.935 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.85B | 70.6B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.13 | 750% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.96 | 10.50 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.01 | 37.23 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.09 | 27.64 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 63.65 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers