GAIN
Price
$14.32
Change
+$0.08 (+0.56%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
510.72M
24 days until earnings call
MAAS
Price
$3.35
Change
-$0.28 (-7.71%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.28B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GAIN vs MAAS

Header iconGAIN vs MAAS Comparison
Open Charts GAIN vs MAASBanner chart's image
Gladstone Investment
Price$14.32
Change+$0.08 (+0.56%)
Volume$81.43K
Capitalization510.72M
Maase
Price$3.35
Change-$0.28 (-7.71%)
Volume$85.92K
Capitalization2.28B
GAIN vs MAAS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GAIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GAIN vs. MAAS commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAIN is a Buy and MAAS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (GAIN: $14.32 vs. MAAS: $3.35)
Brand notoriety: GAIN and MAAS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GAIN: 53% vs. MAAS: 61%
Market capitalization -- GAIN: $510.72M vs. MAAS: $2.28B
GAIN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $510.72M. MAAS’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $2.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GAIN’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMAAS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GAIN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MAAS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GAIN is a better buy in the long-term than MAAS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GAIN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAAS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GAIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MAAS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GAIN is a better buy in the short-term than MAAS.

Price Growth

GAIN (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.49% price change this week, while MAAS (@Investment Managers) price change was -19.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

GAIN is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

MAAS is expected to report earnings on May 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAAS($2.28B) has a higher market cap than GAIN($511M). MAAS YTD gains are higher at: 900.000 vs. GAIN (15.995).
GAINMAASGAIN / MAAS
Capitalization511M2.28B22%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD15.995900.0002%
P/E Ratio7.05N/A-
Revenue60.8MN/A-
Total Cash3.05MN/A-
Total Debt414MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GAIN vs MAAS: Fundamental Ratings
GAIN
MAAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9100
SMR RATING
1..100
4096
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4934
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
19100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GAIN's Valuation (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAAS (62). This means that GAIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAAS’s over the last 12 months.

GAIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAAS (100). This means that GAIN’s stock grew significantly faster than MAAS’s over the last 12 months.

GAIN's SMR Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAAS (96). This means that GAIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAAS’s over the last 12 months.

MAAS's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as GAIN (49). This means that MAAS’s stock grew similarly to GAIN’s over the last 12 months.

GAIN's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAAS (100). This means that GAIN’s stock grew significantly faster than MAAS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GAINMAAS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GAIN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DESSX23.990.18
+0.76%
DWS ESG Core Equity S
DAREX13.980.09
+0.65%
Dunham Real Estate Stock A
UMEMX15.150.08
+0.53%
Columbia Emerging Markets Inst
JMVPX35.600.14
+0.39%
JPMorgan Mid Cap Value R3
MERAX15.410.05
+0.33%
Madison Mid Cap A

MAAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAAS and OCCIN have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAAS and OCCIN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAAS
1D Price
Change %
MAAS100%
-7.84%
OCCIN - MAAS
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
PTMN - MAAS
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
DHIL - MAAS
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
CRBG - MAAS
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
GAIN - MAAS
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
More