GALKF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
5.81M
ORFDF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
14.32M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GALKF vs ORFDF

Header iconGALKF vs ORFDF Comparison
Open Charts GALKF vs ORFDFBanner chart's image
Galantas Gold
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$40K
Capitalization5.81M
ORECAP INVEST
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$118K
Capitalization14.32M
GALKF vs ORFDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GALKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ORFDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GALKF vs. ORFDF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GALKF is a Hold and ORFDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (GALKF: $0.05 vs. ORFDF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: GALKF and ORFDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GALKF: 43% vs. ORFDF: 222%
Market capitalization -- GALKF: $5.81M vs. ORFDF: $14.32M
GALKF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $5.81M. ORFDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $14.32M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $83.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GALKF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileORFDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GALKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ORFDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ORFDF is a better buy in the long-term than GALKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GALKF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ORFDF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GALKF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • ORFDF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ORFDF is a better buy in the short-term than GALKF.

Price Growth

GALKF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -18.04% price change this week, while ORFDF (@Precious Metals) price change was +12.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +6.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3316.97%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+6.27% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ORFDF($14.3M) has a higher market cap than GALKF($5.81M). ORFDF YTD gains are higher at: 31.519 vs. GALKF (24.468). GALKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 917K vs. ORFDF (-5.7M). ORFDF has more cash in the bank: 15.4M vs. GALKF (729K). GALKF (0) and ORFDF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GALKFORFDFGALKF / ORFDF
Capitalization5.81M14.3M41%
EBITDA917K-5.7M-16%
Gain YTD24.46831.51978%
P/E RatioN/A7.06-
Revenue00-
Total Cash729K15.4M5%
Total Debt7.01MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GALKF vs ORFDF: Fundamental Ratings
GALKF
ORFDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5976
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6041
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ORFDF's Valuation (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GALKF (93). This means that ORFDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GALKF’s over the last 12 months.

ORFDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GALKF (100). This means that ORFDF’s stock grew similarly to GALKF’s over the last 12 months.

ORFDF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GALKF (100). This means that ORFDF’s stock grew similarly to GALKF’s over the last 12 months.

ORFDF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as GALKF (60). This means that ORFDF’s stock grew similarly to GALKF’s over the last 12 months.

ORFDF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GALKF (100). This means that ORFDF’s stock grew similarly to GALKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GALKFORFDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GALKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ORFDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRTX1.830.27
+17.24%
BioRestorative Therapies
INSM134.970.44
+0.33%
Insmed
FULT19.67-0.19
-0.96%
Fulton Financial Corp
FOSL3.02-0.04
-1.31%
Fossil Group
JBSS64.59-1.05
-1.60%
John B Sanfilippo & Son

ORFDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ORFDF and GALKF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ORFDF and GALKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ORFDF
1D Price
Change %
ORFDF100%
-1.69%
GALKF - ORFDF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.54%
ORZCF - ORFDF
14%
Poorly correlated
-13.68%
ORLA - ORFDF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
OPWEF - ORFDF
4%
Poorly correlated
-6.00%
PAFRF - ORFDF
2%
Poorly correlated
+31.77%
More