GAMB
Price
$14.63
Change
-$1.22 (-7.70%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
345.8M
25 days until earnings call
SKXJF
Price
$12.23
Change
-$1.07 (-8.05%)
Updated
Jan 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.48B
Ad is loading...

GAMB vs SKXJF

Header iconGAMB vs SKXJF Comparison
Open Charts GAMB vs SKXJFBanner chart's image
Gambling.com Group
Price$14.63
Change-$1.22 (-7.70%)
Volume$815.2K
Capitalization345.8M
Sankyo
Price$12.23
Change-$1.07 (-8.05%)
Volume$200
Capitalization2.48B
GAMB vs SKXJF Comparison Chart
Loading...
GAMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GAMB vs. SKXJF commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAMB is a Hold and SKXJF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (GAMB: $14.63 vs. SKXJF: $12.23)
Brand notoriety: GAMB and SKXJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GAMB: 212% vs. SKXJF: 119%
Market capitalization -- GAMB: $345.8M vs. SKXJF: $2.48B
GAMB [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $345.8M. SKXJF’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $2.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $5.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GAMB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSKXJF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • GAMB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SKXJF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SKXJF is a better buy in the long-term than GAMB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GAMB’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GAMB’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 8 bearish.

Price Growth

GAMB (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -12.66% price change this week, while SKXJF (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -1.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +74.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

GAMB is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (-1.55% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SKXJF($2.48B) has a higher market cap than GAMB($346M). GAMB has higher P/E ratio than SKXJF: GAMB (19.77) vs SKXJF (7.75). GAMB YTD gains are higher at: 3.906 vs. SKXJF (-8.045). SKXJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 49.4B vs. GAMB (23.1M). SKXJF has more cash in the bank: 242B vs. GAMB (25.4M). GAMB has less debt than SKXJF: GAMB (1.72M) vs SKXJF (20B). SKXJF has higher revenues than GAMB: SKXJF (143B) vs GAMB (109M).
GAMBSKXJFGAMB / SKXJF
Capitalization346M2.48B14%
EBITDA23.1M49.4B0%
Gain YTD3.906-8.045-49%
P/E Ratio19.777.75255%
Revenue109M143B0%
Total Cash25.4M242B0%
Total Debt1.72M20B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SKXJF: Fundamental Ratings
SKXJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
21
SMR RATING
1..100
31
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GAMB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GAMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MKVGX14.11-0.07
-0.49%
MFS International Large Cap Value R4
FERRX11.07-0.13
-1.16%
First Eagle Global Real Assets R6
RCEYX58.29-0.80
-1.35%
Victory RS Large Cap Alpha Y
DCLVX18.24-0.25
-1.35%
Dunham Large Cap Value C
EZTGX51.72-0.92
-1.75%
Eaton Vance Tx-Mgd Growth 1.2 C

GAMB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GAMB and CZR have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GAMB and CZR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GAMB
1D Price
Change %
GAMB100%
-7.70%
CZR - GAMB
33%
Poorly correlated
-6.41%
MCRI - GAMB
33%
Poorly correlated
-3.45%
GEBHF - GAMB
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WYNN - GAMB
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.90%
RSI - GAMB
30%
Poorly correlated
-11.29%
More

SKXJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SKXJF and RANKF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SKXJF and RANKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SKXJF
1D Price
Change %
SKXJF100%
N/A
RANKF - SKXJF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGHC - SKXJF
14%
Poorly correlated
-4.70%
KNDGF - SKXJF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GAMB - SKXJF
7%
Poorly correlated
-7.70%
JPOTF - SKXJF
6%
Poorly correlated
-5.92%
More