GAMI
Price
$24.00
Change
-$0.99 (-3.96%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
529.48M
58 days until earnings call
SHNWF
Price
$5.45
Change
+$0.65 (+13.54%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
7.9B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GAMI vs SHNWF

Header iconGAMI vs SHNWF Comparison
Open Charts GAMI vs SHNWFBanner chart's image
GAMCO Investors
Price$24.00
Change-$0.99 (-3.96%)
Volume$3.13K
Capitalization529.48M
Schroders
Price$5.45
Change+$0.65 (+13.54%)
Volume$930
Capitalization7.9B
GAMI vs SHNWF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GAMI vs. SHNWF commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAMI is a Hold and SHNWF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (GAMI: $24.00 vs. SHNWF: $5.45)
Brand notoriety: GAMI and SHNWF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GAMI: 167% vs. SHNWF: 55%
Market capitalization -- GAMI: $529.48M vs. SHNWF: $7.9B
GAMI [@Investment Managers] is valued at $529.48M. SHNWF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $7.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GAMI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSHNWF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GAMI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SHNWF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SHNWF is a better buy in the long-term than GAMI.

Price Growth

GAMI (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.69% price change this week, while SHNWF (@Investment Managers) price change was +13.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

GAMI is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

SHNWF is expected to report earnings on Mar 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.10% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHNWF($7.9B) has a higher market cap than GAMI($529M). SHNWF has higher P/E ratio than GAMI: SHNWF (12.05) vs GAMI (8.47). SHNWF YTD gains are higher at: 29.762 vs. GAMI (-0.106).
GAMISHNWFGAMI / SHNWF
Capitalization529M7.9B7%
EBITDA81.2MN/A-
Gain YTD-0.10629.762-0%
P/E Ratio8.4712.0570%
Revenue249MN/A-
Total Cash133MN/A-
Total Debt5.66MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GAMI: Fundamental Ratings
GAMI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
38
SMR RATING
1..100
23
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
66
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VGWLX26.77-0.19
-0.70%
Vanguard Global Wellington Investor
MKDVX20.22-0.23
-1.12%
BlackRock Equity Dividend K
MXXVX34.20-0.48
-1.38%
Matthew 25
GSQRX30.77-0.56
-1.79%
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value R
RDVIX5.74-0.11
-1.88%
Royce Dividend Value Invmt

GAMI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GAMI has been loosely correlated with STT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GAMI jumps, then STT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GAMI
1D Price
Change %
GAMI100%
-3.96%
STT - GAMI
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.50%
VCTR - GAMI
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.70%
BBDC - GAMI
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
CG - GAMI
31%
Poorly correlated
-3.21%
AMG - GAMI
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.12%
More

SHNWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHNWF and STT have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHNWF and STT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHNWF
1D Price
Change %
SHNWF100%
+13.54%
STT - SHNWF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.50%
FNCSF - SHNWF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BAM - SHNWF
12%
Poorly correlated
-2.74%
BBUC - SHNWF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.70%
GAMI - SHNWF
6%
Poorly correlated
-3.96%
More