GAMI
Price
$22.75
Change
-$0.23 (-1.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
507.68M
38 days until earnings call
SHNWF
Price
$5.33
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
7.7B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GAMI vs SHNWF

Header iconGAMI vs SHNWF Comparison
Open Charts GAMI vs SHNWFBanner chart's image
GAMCO Investors
Price$22.75
Change-$0.23 (-1.00%)
Volume$2.11K
Capitalization507.68M
Schroders
Price$5.33
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$357
Capitalization7.7B
GAMI vs SHNWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GAMI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHNWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GAMI vs. SHNWF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAMI is a Hold and SHNWF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (GAMI: $22.75 vs. SHNWF: $5.32)
Brand notoriety: GAMI and SHNWF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GAMI: 26% vs. SHNWF: 9%
Market capitalization -- GAMI: $507.68M vs. SHNWF: $7.7B
GAMI [@Investment Managers] is valued at $507.68M. SHNWF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $7.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $179.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GAMI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSHNWF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GAMI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SHNWF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SHNWF is a better buy in the long-term than GAMI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GAMI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHNWF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GAMI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SHNWF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GAMI is a better buy in the short-term than SHNWF.

Price Growth

GAMI (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.52% price change this week, while SHNWF (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.98%.

Reported Earning Dates

GAMI is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.00% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHNWF($7.7B) has a higher market cap than GAMI($508M). SHNWF has higher P/E ratio than GAMI: SHNWF (17.75) vs GAMI (8.72). SHNWF YTD gains are higher at: 26.786 vs. GAMI (-4.994). SHNWF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 655M vs. GAMI (84.6M). GAMI has less debt than SHNWF: GAMI (4.64M) vs SHNWF (588M). SHNWF has higher revenues than GAMI: SHNWF (3.02B) vs GAMI (250M).
GAMISHNWFGAMI / SHNWF
Capitalization508M7.7B7%
EBITDA84.6M655M13%
Gain YTD-4.99426.786-19%
P/E Ratio8.7217.7549%
Revenue250M3.02B8%
Total CashN/A7.06B-
Total Debt4.64M588M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GAMI: Fundamental Ratings
GAMI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
44
SMR RATING
1..100
23
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
77
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
68
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GAMISHNWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
69%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GAMI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHNWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RWX27.560.33
+1.21%
SPDR® Dow Jones® International RelEstETF
PBL30.800.10
+0.32%
PGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF
IGEB45.950.06
+0.13%
iShares Investment Grade Systmtc Bd ETF
DYLG26.82N/A
N/A
Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & GrowthETF
TAXM50.03N/A
N/A
Bondbloxx Ir+M Tax-Aware ETF For Massachusetts Residents

GAMI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GAMI has been loosely correlated with STT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GAMI jumps, then STT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GAMI
1D Price
Change %
GAMI100%
-1.00%
STT - GAMI
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.29%
VCTR - GAMI
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
BBDC - GAMI
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.67%
CG - GAMI
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
AMG - GAMI
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
More

SHNWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHNWF and STT have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHNWF and STT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHNWF
1D Price
Change %
SHNWF100%
N/A
STT - SHNWF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.29%
FNCSF - SHNWF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BAM - SHNWF
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
BBUC - SHNWF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
GAMI - SHNWF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
More