GASNY vs PNAGF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GASNY is a Hold and PNAGF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GASNY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePNAGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GASNY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PNAGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
GASNY (@Gas Distributors) experienced а +3.54% price change this week, while PNAGF (@Gas Distributors) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Gas Distributors industry was -0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.33%.
Reported Earning Dates
GASNY is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Gas Distributors (-0.58% weekly)Gas distributors are involved in moving and selling gas – from wellheads or over-distribution systems operated by other firms – to residential and non-residential customers. These companies perform tasks such as the gathering and processing of gas, intrastate and interstate transport, and delivery to the customer. Some of the biggest gas distributing companies in the U.S. include Sempra Energy, Avangrid Inc and Atmos Energy Corporation.
| GASNY | PNAGF | GASNY / PNAGF | |
| Capitalization | 29.6B | 7.63B | 388% |
| EBITDA | 5.26B | 3.65B | 144% |
| Gain YTD | -13.044 | 8.108 | -161% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.21 | 19.10 | 64% |
| Revenue | 29.3B | 6.45B | 455% |
| Total Cash | 4.76B | 3.53B | 135% |
| Total Debt | 15.5B | 3.15B | 492% |
GASNY | PNAGF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 45 Fair valued | 98 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 59 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 68 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GASNY's Valuation (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PNAGF (98). This means that GASNY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PNAGF’s over the last 12 months.
GASNY's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PNAGF (100). This means that GASNY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PNAGF’s over the last 12 months.
PNAGF's SMR Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GASNY (96). This means that PNAGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GASNY’s over the last 12 months.
PNAGF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as GASNY (72). This means that PNAGF’s stock grew similarly to GASNY’s over the last 12 months.
GASNY's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as PNAGF (68). This means that GASNY’s stock grew similarly to PNAGF’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DOL | 50.31 | 0.09 | +0.18% |
| WisdomTree International LargeCp Div ETF | |||
| ANGL | 28.93 | N/A | N/A |
| VanEck Fallen Angel HiYld Bd ETF | |||
| UAPR | 30.66 | -0.19 | -0.62% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra BffrETF™-Apr | |||
| ILDR | 25.31 | -0.71 | -2.74% |
| First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF | |||
| RAYS | 9.88 | -0.56 | -5.36% |
| Global X Solar ETF | |||
GASNY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GASNY has been loosely correlated with ENGGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GASNY jumps, then ENGGY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GASNY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GASNY | 100% | +1.84% | ||
| ENGGY - GASNY | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.94% | ||
| SNMRY - GASNY | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.67% | ||
| NJR - GASNY | 25% Poorly correlated | +1.57% | ||
| BKH - GASNY | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.10% | ||
| NI - GASNY | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.53% | ||
More | ||||
PNAGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PNAGF and ENGGY have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PNAGF and ENGGY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PNAGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PNAGF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ENGGY - PNAGF | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.94% | ||
| HOKCY - PNAGF | 2% Poorly correlated | -2.00% | ||
| GASNY - PNAGF | 0% Poorly correlated | +1.84% | ||
| GASNF - PNAGF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PPAAF - PNAGF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||