GAYMF
Price
$0.51
Change
+$0.06 (+13.64%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
54.4M
GFKRF
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.03 (+300.00%)
Updated
Jul 29 closing price
Capitalization
10.08M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GAYMF vs GFKRF

Header iconGAYMF vs GFKRF Comparison
Open Charts GAYMF vs GFKRFBanner chart's image
Galway Metals
Price$0.51
Change+$0.06 (+13.64%)
Volume$623.94K
Capitalization54.4M
Opus One Gold
Price$0.04
Change+$0.03 (+300.00%)
Volume$250
Capitalization10.08M
GAYMF vs GFKRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GAYMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GAYMF vs. GFKRF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GAYMF is a Buy and GFKRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (GAYMF: $0.50 vs. GFKRF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: GAYMF and GFKRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GAYMF: 477% vs. GFKRF: 13%
Market capitalization -- GAYMF: $54.4M vs. GFKRF: $10.08M
GAYMF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $54.4M. GFKRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $10.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $102.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GAYMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGFKRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GAYMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GFKRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GFKRF is a better buy in the long-term than GAYMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GAYMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GAYMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

GAYMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +12.55% price change this week, while GFKRF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +7.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +32.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6088.40%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+7.09% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GAYMF($54.4M) has a higher market cap than GFKRF($10.1M). GFKRF YTD gains are higher at: 335.000 vs. GAYMF (42.334). GFKRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.16M vs. GAYMF (-8.24M). GAYMF has more cash in the bank: 7.62M vs. GFKRF (615K). GAYMF (0) and GFKRF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GAYMFGFKRFGAYMF / GFKRF
Capitalization54.4M10.1M539%
EBITDA-8.24M-1.16M707%
Gain YTD42.334335.00013%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash7.62M615K1,239%
Total Debt75KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GAYMF vs GFKRF: Fundamental Ratings
GAYMF
GFKRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9797
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3634
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GFKRF's Valuation (48) in the null industry is in the same range as GAYMF (66). This means that GFKRF’s stock grew similarly to GAYMF’s over the last 12 months.

GFKRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GAYMF (100). This means that GFKRF’s stock grew similarly to GAYMF’s over the last 12 months.

GFKRF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as GAYMF (97). This means that GFKRF’s stock grew similarly to GAYMF’s over the last 12 months.

GFKRF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as GAYMF (36). This means that GFKRF’s stock grew similarly to GAYMF’s over the last 12 months.

GFKRF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GAYMF (100). This means that GFKRF’s stock grew similarly to GAYMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GAYMFGFKRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
85%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GAYMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SNOW224.643.04
+1.37%
Snowflake
LAZ53.960.23
+0.43%
Lazard
TRVG3.45N/A
N/A
trivago NV
LMB93.01-0.37
-0.40%
Limbach Holdings
ADGM1.91-0.12
-5.91%
Adagio Medical Holdings Inc.

GAYMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GAYMF has been loosely correlated with HMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GAYMF jumps, then HMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GAYMF
1D Price
Change %
GAYMF100%
+13.48%
HMY - GAYMF
34%
Loosely correlated
+5.47%
NGD - GAYMF
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
BTG - GAYMF
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
DRD - GAYMF
31%
Poorly correlated
+7.41%
RGLD - GAYMF
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.86%
More

GFKRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GFKRF and GFGSF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GFKRF and GFGSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFKRF
1D Price
Change %
GFKRF100%
N/A
GFGSF - GFKRF
10%
Poorly correlated
+5.25%
GAYMF - GFKRF
8%
Poorly correlated
+13.48%
GBBFF - GFKRF
5%
Poorly correlated
+9.97%
GGLDF - GFKRF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.47%
GLBKF - GFKRF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More