GBBFF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 10 closing price
Capitalization
2.84M
GFGSF
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
18.17M
Ad is loading...

GBBFF vs GFGSF

Header iconGBBFF vs GFGSF Comparison
Open Charts GBBFF vs GFGSFBanner chart's image
Granada Gold Mine
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$14K
Capitalization2.84M
GFG Resources
Price$0.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10.5K
Capitalization18.17M
GBBFF vs GFGSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
GBBFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GFGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GBBFF vs. GFGSF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GBBFF is a Hold and GFGSF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (GBBFF: $0.02 vs. GFGSF: $0.12)
Brand notoriety: GBBFF and GFGSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GBBFF: 100% vs. GFGSF: 5%
Market capitalization -- GBBFF: $2.84M vs. GFGSF: $18.17M
GBBFF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $2.84M. GFGSF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $18.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GBBFF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGFGSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GBBFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GFGSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GBBFF is a better buy in the long-term than GFGSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GBBFF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFGSF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GBBFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • GFGSF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GFGSF is a better buy in the short-term than GBBFF.

Price Growth

GBBFF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GFGSF (@Precious Metals) price change was -11.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.47%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.38% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFGSF($18.2M) has a higher market cap than GBBFF($2.84M). GFGSF YTD gains are higher at: -6.535 vs. GBBFF (-21.250). GFGSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.07M vs. GBBFF (-2.35M). GFGSF has more cash in the bank: 4.77M vs. GBBFF (213K). GFGSF has less debt than GBBFF: GFGSF (129K) vs GBBFF (1.26M). GBBFF (0) and GFGSF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GBBFFGFGSFGBBFF / GFGSF
Capitalization2.84M18.2M16%
EBITDA-2.35M-1.07M221%
Gain YTD-21.250-6.535325%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash213K4.77M4%
Total Debt1.26M129K973%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GBBFF vs GFGSF: Fundamental Ratings
GBBFF
GFGSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10090
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6538
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
30100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GBBFF's Valuation (27) in the null industry is in the same range as GFGSF (38). This means that GBBFF’s stock grew similarly to GFGSF’s over the last 12 months.

GBBFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GFGSF (100). This means that GBBFF’s stock grew similarly to GFGSF’s over the last 12 months.

GFGSF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as GBBFF (100). This means that GFGSF’s stock grew similarly to GBBFF’s over the last 12 months.

GFGSF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as GBBFF (65). This means that GFGSF’s stock grew similarly to GBBFF’s over the last 12 months.

GBBFF's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GFGSF (100). This means that GBBFF’s stock grew significantly faster than GFGSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GBBFFGFGSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GBBFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GFGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TWGIX61.030.68
+1.13%
American Century Growth I
FTXFX51.000.45
+0.89%
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Gr R6
GPEOX11.360.07
+0.62%
Grandeur Peak Emerg Mkts Opps Inv
FSHOX125.210.75
+0.60%
Fidelity Select Construction & Housing
WDSAX13.740.04
+0.29%
Allspring Disciplined Small Cap A

GBBFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GBBFF and DNCVF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GBBFF and DNCVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GBBFF
1D Price
Change %
GBBFF100%
N/A
DNCVF - GBBFF
24%
Poorly correlated
-9.03%
TETOF - GBBFF
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.41%
AUXXF - GBBFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+6.01%
ENDMF - GBBFF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANGVF - GBBFF
20%
Poorly correlated
-6.58%
More

GFGSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GFGSF and WVMDF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GFGSF and WVMDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFGSF
1D Price
Change %
GFGSF100%
+0.42%
WVMDF - GFGSF
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.02%
EQMEF - GFGSF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.40%
ANGPY - GFGSF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
BHLL - GFGSF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
GBBFF - GFGSF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More